A man buried in Romania in the Mesolithic era

rom061
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
rom061
Date:
7584 BCE - 7491 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
H13
Y-DNA:
Not available
Cultural Period:
Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania
Location
Country:
Romania
Locality:
Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Mesolithic era, often seen as a transitional period between the Paleolithic and Neolithic ages, held significant importance in the region known as the Iron Gates along the Danube River, straddling the modern borders of Romania and Serbia. This area is notable for its rich archaeological history and the transition of human societies during the Mesolithic period, particularly for the European hunter-gatherer cultures that thrived there.

Geography and Environment

The Iron Gates refers to the series of gorges on the Danube River that create a natural border between the Carpathian and Balkan mountains. This environment is characterized by its dramatic landscapes, including rocky cliffs, narrow river passages, and fertile floodplains. During the Mesolithic period, the climate was gradually warming after the last Ice Age, leading to changes in flora and fauna, which supported diverse ecosystems ideal for Mesolithic communities.

Settlements and Living Conditions

Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in the Iron Gates region developed semi-permanent settlements along the riverbanks, taking advantage of the rich aquatic resources. Excavations at sites like Lepenski Vir on the Serbian bank and Schela Cladovei in Romania reveal evidence of substantial constructions. In particular, Lepenski Vir is noted for its trapezoidal buildings, which were constructed using stone, clay, and timber, reflecting an advanced form of architectural planning for the period.

Subsistence Strategies

The Mesolithic population of the Iron Gates primarily subsisted on a mixed diet of terrestrial and aquatic resources. The Danube River provided abundant fish, particularly sturgeon, which were a staple of the diet. Fish remains found at these sites suggest sophisticated fishing techniques, including the use of nets, traps, and fishing weirs. Additionally, hunting supplemented their diet with species such as wild boar, deer, and birds. Gathering played a crucial role as well, with evidence of foraged plant foods, nuts, and fruits.

Tools and Technology

The communities of the Iron Gates displayed a highly developed tool assemblage reflective of the region's available materials and the needs of its inhabitants. Microlithic tools, often made from local flint and chert, were common. These small stone tools were likely used in composite tools or as part of fishing and hunting implements. Bone and antler were also important materials, used to craft tools like harpoons, fish hooks, and needles.

Social and Cultural Aspects

Socially, the Mesolithic groups in the Iron Gates likely had complex kinship and social structures, evidenced by burial practices and the organization of settlements. Notably, burials at sites like Lepenski Vir show a diversity of practices, including grave goods that suggest differing statuses or roles within the community. Artistic expressions, such as stone sculptures and carvings discovered at Lepenski Vir, point to a rich symbolic and ritual life, possibly related to their beliefs about the river and its resources.

Transition to the Neolithic

The Iron Gates region is particularly significant for understanding the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Europe. There is evidence of gradual cultural exchange and interaction between indigenous hunter-gatherers and incoming Neolithic farming communities. This interaction influenced the adoption of agriculture and the eventual shift toward sedentary farming lifestyles.

In summary, the Mesolithic era at the Iron Gates in Romania was a period of adaptation and innovation for European hunter-gatherers. The region's rich natural resources, coupled with the cultural and technological advancements of its inhabitants, laid a foundation for significant transformations in prehistoric European societies. Through ongoing archaeological research, the Mesolithic Iron Gates continue to provide insights into the complex interplay between environment, subsistence strategies, and cultural evolution during this pivotal era.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I2534 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 5810 BCE Magura Buduiasca. Teleor 3, Romania View
I5411 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7000 BCE Iron Gates. Schela Cladovei, Romania View
I4582 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7026 BCE Iron Gates. Ostrovul Corbului, Romania View
I4607 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7446 BCE Iron Gates. Schela Cladovei, Romania View
I5436 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7451 BCE Iron Gates. Schela Cladovei, Romania View
M96 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7250 BCE Iron Gates. Schela Cladovei, Romania View
I5408 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7022 BCE Iron Gates. Ostrovul Corbului, Romania View
M95 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7125 BCE Iron Gates. Schela Cladovei, Romania View
I4081 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7581 BCE Iron Gates. Ostrovul Corbului, Romania View
I4655 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7059 BCE Iron Gates. Schela Cladovei, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
OC Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7022 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (rom061) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Western Steppe Pastoralists 62%
European Hunter-Gatherers 26%
Neolithic Farmers 9%
Ancient Asians 2%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (rom061) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 97%
Northwestern European 93%
Finnish 39.3%
English 30.2%
Scandinavian 23.3%
Eastern European 4%
Eastern European 4.3%
Africa 3%
West African 3%
Ghanaian, Liberian, Sierra Leonean 2.9%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample rom061 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

rom061,0.13114588,0.11907596,0.0904418,0.0777122,0.04096312,0.03368952,0.00853632,0.01741544,-0.00137096,-0.0325444,0.00138644,-0.0076184,0.01361544,0.0154608,0.00047304,0.00102896,0.00214944,-0.00294892,0.00553,0.001295,0.00303,-0.00547576,-0.00483896,0.00864508,0.00198688
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 24 2025