A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era

poz275
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
poz275
Date:
3954 BCE - 3711 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
HV+16311
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Lublin-Volhynian Culture
Location
Country:
Poland
Locality:
Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Lublin-Volhynian culture is an archaeological culture from the Neolithic era that existed primarily from around 3600 to 2600 BCE. This culture is part of the broader linear pottery cultures associated with the spread of farming communities across Central Europe, particularly in areas that are today part of Poland, Ukraine, and parts of Belarus. The culture derives its name from the Lublin region in modern Poland and Volhynia, which is now part of northwestern Ukraine.

Geographic Location and Environment:

The Lublin-Volhynian culture emerged in the fertile regions characterized by loess soils, which were ideal for agricultural practices that defined much of the Neolithic lifestyle. This geographical region consists of river valleys, notably along the Bug and Dniester rivers, providing water resources and enabling trade and communication with neighboring cultures.

Societal Structure:

The Lublin-Volhynian culture is characterized by its sedentary lifestyle, with communities living in permanent settlements. The population density was relatively low, with small to medium-sized villages. These settlements typically consisted of a few longhouses made of wood and clay, indicating a degree of communal living. The society likely had a hierarchical structure with some form of tribal leadership or council of elders, although evidence is more reliant on archaeological inferences than direct literary records.

Economy and Subsistence:

The economy was predominantly agrarian, relying on farming and animal husbandry. The people cultivated crops like emmer wheat, barley, peas, and flax. Livestock such as cattle, pigs, goats, and sheep were common, used both for meat and secondary products such as milk and wool. Agriculture was supported by the fertile soil and favorable climate of Central Europe during this period.

Material Culture and Artifacts:

One of the distinctive features of the Lublin-Volhynian culture is its pottery. The ceramics were often undecorated, with some instances of simple geometric designs, yet they were functional and well-crafted, suggesting a high level of skill. Tools made of flint, stone, bone, and antler were common, including sickles, axes, and knives, supporting their agricultural lifestyle.

Burial Practices:

Burial practices of the Lublin-Volhynian culture include both inhumation and cremation, with bodies often placed in a fetal position or on their sides in pits. Grave goods sometimes accompanied the deceased, including pottery, tools, and ornaments, indicating a belief in an afterlife and the importance of certain items in their cultural rituals.

Interactions and Trade:

The culture was not isolated; it engaged in trade with neighboring regions, which is evident from the presence of foreign materials such as obsidian and shells in archaeological sites. These interactions were facilitated by the geographic location along major river corridors, connecting them to other Neolithic cultures in Europe.

Religion and Beliefs:

Although direct evidence of religious practices is limited, it is inferred from burial practices that the Lublin-Volhynian culture had spiritual beliefs possibly related to ancestor worship or nature reverence. Artifacts such as figurines may suggest ritualistic or ceremonial activities.

Decline and Legacy:

The Lublin-Volhynian culture eventually transitioned or amalgamated into other succeeding cultures around 2600 BCE, influenced by the movement of peoples and changing environmental conditions. It forms a significant part of the Neolithic tapestry of Central Europe, contributing to the agricultural and societal developments that laid the groundwork for later Bronze Age cultures in the region.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz275) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 59%
European Hunter-Gatherers 28%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 13%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz275) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 91%
Southern European 87%
Italian 51.4%
Sardinian 34.2%
Iberian 1.7%
Northwestern European 3%
Northwestern European 3.4%
Africa 5%
North African 5%
Egyptian 4.4%
North African 1.0%
Asia 4%
Northern West Asian 4%
Cypriot 4.0%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample poz275 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

poz275,0.11440202,0.15798606,0.01573404,-0.04936756,0.05255408,-0.02305506,-0.00386324,0.00399936,0.03708518,0.06662648,-0.00236412,0.01283648,-0.02239188,-0.0139505,-0.01207704,0.0063164,0.01677138,-4.868E-05,-1.634E-05,-0.0044105,-0.00039248,0.003221,-0.00938532,-0.01688308,0.00370434
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025