A man buried in Romania in the Copper Age era

rom047
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
rom047
Date:
4343 BCE - 4176 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
H26
Y-DNA:
Not available
Cultural Period:
Decea Mureșului Culture
Location
Country:
Romania
Locality:
village Decea Mureșului, Alba county
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Decea Mureșului culture represents a significant yet somewhat obscure archaeological culture located in present-day Romania, particularly concentrated along the Mureș River in Transylvania. This culture is important within the framework of Early Indo-European societies and is commonly dated to the early Bronze Age, approximately between 1900 and 1600 BCE, overlapping with the transitional phase from the Copper Age into the Bronze Age.

Geographic and Temporal Context

The Decea Mureșului culture is primarily situated in the region of Transylvania, an area known for its strategic importance and fertile lands, bordered by the Carpathian Mountains. This region served as a conduit for various cultural and migratory influences due to its location bridging the Balkans and Central Europe. The timeline of this culture places it in the context of significant technological, social, and cultural transformations as communities transitioned from the use of copper to bronze, leveraging new metallurgical techniques that would later define the Bronze Age.

Material Culture

Settlements and Architecture

Archaeological findings indicate that the Decea Mureșului culture consisted of small, scattered settlements. These were primarily composed of semi-subterranean dwellings, typical of many early Bronze Age communities, constructed using wood and thatch. This construction style reflects a semi-nomadic lifestyle, reliant on pastoral activities and small-scale agriculture.

Ceramics

Ceramics form a crucial aspect of the Decea Mureșului material culture. Pottery from this culture tends to be utilitarian but begins to show increasing sophistication in form and decoration compared to previous cultures. The ceramics are generally handmade, featuring geometric patterns and incised designs, which provide insights into the aesthetic values and symbolic systems of the community.

Metallurgy

Being a culture at the dawn of the Bronze Age, the Decea Mureșului people engaged in early forms of metallurgy. Artifacts such as simple bronze tools and ornaments indicate both local innovation and potential long-distance trade connections, as the knowledge of bronze crafting spread across Europe. The presence of bronze signifies a cultural and technological leap, offering advantages in tool-making, agriculture, and warfare.

Economy and Subsistence

The Decea Mureșului culture subsisted on a mixed economy of agriculture, animal husbandry, and foraging. The fertile plains of the Mureș River likely supported the cultivation of crops such as barley and wheat. Livestock, including cattle, sheep, and goats, played a vital role in their economy, providing meat, milk, wool, and serving as a status symbol. There is evidence to suggest that trade networks facilitated the movement of goods and resources, connecting them with neighboring cultures and regions.

Social and Religious Life

The social structure of the Decea Mureșului culture, while not fully understood due to limited evidence, likely featured emerging hierarchical elements, as seen in other contemporary Bronze Age societies. There may have been chieftains or elite individuals controlling access to resources or trade.

Religion and ritual practices are harder to delineate with certainty, though it is plausible that the people held animistic or early Indo-European spiritual beliefs, venerating natural elements and relying on shamanistic practices. Burial customs suggest some complexity in their belief system, with grave goods often accompanying the deceased, hinting at an emerging notion of an afterlife.

Interaction and Legacy

The Decea Mureșului culture was part of a broader tapestry of early Indo-European cultures, both influencing and being influenced by its neighbors. Its strategic position facilitated interactions with other cultures, such as the Glina and Otomani cultures, contributing to the dynamic cultural landscape of Early Bronze Age Europe.

In summary, the Decea Mureșului culture presents a fascinating snapshot of an early Indo-European society navigating the challenges of a rapidly changing world. With its roots deeply embedded in both local traditions and broader Indo-European patterns, this culture epitomizes the delicate balance of continuity and innovation that characterizes the early phases of the Bronze Age in Europe.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (rom047) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 56%
European Hunter-Gatherers 29%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 11%
Ancient Asians 4%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (rom047) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 87%
Southern European 87%
Italian 47.0%
Sardinian 26.9%
Balkan 9.5%
Iberian 3.5%
Asia 7%
Northern West Asian 7%
Cypriot 7.1%
Africa 6%
North African 6%
North African 3.6%
Egyptian 2.5%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample rom047 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

rom047,0.11005198,0.16053788,0.01464486,-0.05358354,0.05312422,-0.02456208,-0.00333994,0.004185,0.03924152,0.06877612,-0.00175162,0.01238874,-0.0223889,-0.01464224,-0.01154068,0.00476518,0.01462056,-0.00035662,-0.00152876,-0.004633,-0.00254598,0.00224042,-0.01009874,-0.01795724,0.00417685
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025