A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era

buk040
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
buk040
Date:
5204 BCE - 4851 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
Not available
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Boian Culture
Location
Country:
Romania
Locality:
Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Boian culture, which thrived during the Neolithic era, specifically in the 5th millennium BCE, forms an essential component of the archaeological and historical mosaic of Southeastern Europe. Named after the site of Boian in Romania, this culture is largely situated in the regions that now constitute Romania and Bulgaria, along the lower Danube River. This locale provided fertile ground that sustained the agrarian lifestyle of the Boian people, and it is considered as part of the broader Pre-Thracian cultural narrative.

Geographical Context:

The Boian culture developed primarily in the Danubian Plain, an area characterized by its rich floodplains, conducive to agriculture and settlement. This geography is integral to understanding the Boian cultural development; the reliable water supply and fertile lands supported both crop cultivation and livestock rearing. The settlements were strategically located to capitalize on these natural resources, and the presence of the Danube also facilitated trade and interaction with neighboring cultures.

Chronological Framework:

Emerging around 4300 BCE and evolving until approximately 3500 BCE, the Boian culture represents a transitional phase from early Neolithic communities to more sophisticated societal structures that would eventually give rise to Thracian civilizations. The continuity and transitions within the material culture, observed through stratigraphy in archaeological sites, help define the various phases of Boian occupation: from the earlier Giuleşti phase through the later Vidra and Spantov phases.

Societal Structure:

The Boian society was primarily agrarian, with an evident reliance on both agriculture and animal husbandry. The cultivation of cereals such as wheat and barley, along with the raising of domestic animals like cattle, sheep, and goats, provided the necessary staples for subsistence. There was likely a communal aspect to these agricultural activities, suggesting a degree of social organization and cooperation.

Leadership structures remain hypothesized due to limited direct evidence, but the prevalence of communal works such as fortified settlements indicates a level of social stratification and communal governance. These fortifications, particularly from the later phases, suggest a need for defense and perhaps indicate an increase in intergroup conflicts over resources or territory.

Cultural Artifacts:

Significant insights into the Boian culture have been gleaned from their material culture, especially pottery, which displays a progression from simple forms to more intricate and decorative designs, reflecting both aesthetic values and technical advancements. Boian pottery is characterized by its geometric patterns, often incised or painted, and these artifacts also provide evidence of trade through their distribution and influence on surrounding regions.

In addition to pottery, the Boian culture is notable for its lithic industry, with stone tools indicating both subsistence and craft activities. Flint blades, axes, and other implements demonstrate the technological adaptability of these people. Moreover, the use of bone and antler tools reflects a sophisticated understanding and utilization of available materials.

Architectural Practices:

The architecture of Boian settlements reflected both functional and social aspects of their culture. Dwellings were primarily rectangular, constructed using timber frames and mud brick or wattle and daub techniques. The arrangement of these structures, often in clusters, suggests both family units and larger communal living arrangements. The presence of hearths and storage pits within these residences further illustrates the domestic life of Boian society.

Larger, fortified settlements found in later phases may indicate a move toward centralized areas of power or trade, suggesting an evolution in socio-political organization. These sites provide critical evidence of social dynamics, particularly in relation to defense and resource management.

Religious and Ritual Practices:

While direct evidence of religious practices is sparse, the artifacts and burial customs offer clues to the spiritual beliefs of the Boian people. The presence of figurines, likely used as objects of worship or for ritualistic purposes, indicates a spiritual dimension to their culture. Burial practices, though varied, seem to reflect a belief in an afterlife, with grave goods accompanying the deceased as provisions for the journey beyond.

Interaction and Influence:

The Boian culture did not exist in isolation; it interacted with adjacent cultures such as the Gumelnița and Vinča cultures. These interactions are evidenced by similarities in material culture, trade of goods such as obsidian or crafted items, and shared technological innovations. The Boian culture thus played a significant role in the broader cultural and technological exchanges occurring in the region during the Neolithic period.

In summary, the Boian culture provides crucial insights into the Neolithic period in Southeastern Europe, illustrating a transitional era marked by advancements in agriculture, societal organization, and cultural expression. Its remnants offer a window into the lives of early agrarian communities and their role in the prehistoric cultural evolution leading to the emergence of Thracian and other South-Eastern European civilizations.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (buk040) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 69%
European Hunter-Gatherers 20%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 11%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (buk040) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 51%
Southern European 46%
Sardinian 28.7%
Italian 17.5%
Northwestern European 5%
Finnish 5.2%
Asia 47%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 35%
Levantine 29.8%
Arabian 5.3%
Northern West Asian 9%
Cypriot 7.0%
Anatolian 2.1%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 3%
Tibetan 3.0%
Oceania 2%
Melanesian 2%
Papuan 1.5%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample buk040 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

buk040,0.10807412,0.15929976,-0.0058743,-0.06399196,0.03674662,-0.02846088,-0.00259,-5.312E-05,0.0341822,0.05457672,-0.00120286,0.00672408,-0.01082732,-0.00674414,-0.01234574,0.00615404,0.01112908,0.00064878,0.0022407,-0.00289986,-0.00163068,0.0044624,-0.009717,-0.01498448,0.0040307
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025