A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era

poz375
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
poz375
Date:
3951 BCE - 3710 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
T2b3+151
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Lublin-Volhynian Culture
Location
Country:
Poland
Locality:
Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Lublin-Volhynian culture is a significant archaeological culture of the Neolithic period that flourished in Central Europe, particularly in the areas that are now parts of southeastern Poland, western Ukraine, and northeastern Slovakia. Emerging around 3100 BCE and lasting until approximately 2200 BCE, the culture is named after the Lublin region in Poland and the Volhynia region in Ukraine. This culture is part of the broader Neolithic landscape in Europe, known for its transition from hunter-gatherer societies to more stable, agrarian-based communities.

Geographic Extent and Environment

The Lublin-Volhynian culture occupied a diverse geographic area characterized by rolling plains, abundant waterways, and fertile soils, ideal for agriculture. The presence of extensive forested areas and rivers provided resources for hunting, fishing, and gathering, forming a rich environment in which Neolithic communities could thrive. The climate during this period was temperate, with sufficient rainfall that supported the growth of crops and the maintenance of livestock.

Social and Economic Organization

This culture was primarily agrarian, relying heavily on farming and animal husbandry. The inhabitants cultivated a variety of crops, including wheat, barley, legumes, and flax, utilizing basic but effective agricultural techniques. Livestock farming included the rearing of cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats, which not only provided food but also materials like wool and leather for clothing and tools.

The social structure of the Lublin-Volhynian culture is inferred from archaeological findings that suggest relatively egalitarian communities organized in small settlements. These settlements consisted of longhouses that likely served as communal living and working spaces. The culture is noted for its complex social organization that facilitated trade and interaction with neighboring cultures, suggesting a network of exchange for goods like flint, pottery, and possibly even ideas.

Material Culture

One of the defining aspects of the Lublin-Volhynian culture is its pottery, which is characterized by specific styles and techniques. The pottery is often decorated with cord impressions and features various shapes, including pots and bowls used for daily activities such as cooking and storage. These items indicate a level of sophistication in their crafting abilities and an aesthetic sensibility.

Flint tools were integral to the daily life of this culture, crafted for agricultural purposes, hunting, and domestic tasks. Querns and other grinding tools were used to process grains, highlighting the importance of agriculture in their daily lives.

Architecture and Settlement Patterns

Settlements in the Lublin-Volhynian culture were strategically located near water sources and fertile lands. The architectural style included longhouses made of wooden post frames, clay, and wattle daub, reflecting a semi-permanent lifestyle. These structures were durable enough to endure seasonal changes while being relatively easy to construct using locally available materials.

Burial Practices and Religion

Burial practices varied, but some evidence suggests that they practiced both cremation and inhumation, with the latter being more common. The dead were often interred with grave goods such as pottery vessels, tools, and ornaments, which indicates a belief in an afterlife or spiritual continuity. These practices highlight the culture's complex belief system, although specific details of their religious beliefs remain largely speculative due to limited direct evidence.

Interaction with Neighboring Cultures

The Lublin-Volhynian culture existed in a dynamic region where several different cultural groups interacted. There was significant contact with the Funnelbeaker culture to the northwest and the Tripolye culture to the southeast. This interaction likely facilitated the exchange of goods, cultural practices, and technological innovations, evident in similarities in pottery styles and tools across these cultures.

Decline and Legacy

The decline of the Lublin-Volhynian culture is not definitively understood but is likely due to a combination of environmental changes, resource depletion, and increasing competition from neighboring cultures. As with many archaeological cultures, it gradually merged or was absorbed into succeeding cultures.

Today, the legacy of the Lublin-Volhynian culture contributes to our understanding of the development of early agricultural societies in Europe. Its study provides insight into the complex social and economic transitions that characterized the Neolithic period and laid the groundwork for subsequent cultural and technological advancements.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz375) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 61%
European Hunter-Gatherers 22%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 13%
Ancient Asians 4%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz375) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 97%
Southern European 96%
Iberian 43.3%
Italian 32.7%
Sardinian 19.6%
Northwestern European 1%
Northwestern European 1.3%
Asia 3%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 3%
Arabian 2.9%
Northern West Asian 0%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample poz375 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

poz375,0.11609188,0.1564125,0.0280385,-0.03456666,0.0500965,-0.01482212,-0.00465472,0.00454976,0.0350138,0.0596051,-0.00348928,0.01060132,-0.0218431,-0.0142464,-0.00871004,0.00266856,0.01277104,0.00053752,0.00023688,-0.0024345,-0.0012137,0.0013058,-0.00915438,-0.01525324,0.00400198
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025