A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era

poz236
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
poz236
Date:
4311 BCE - 4052 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
K2a
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot
Location
Country:
Poland
Locality:
Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture, particularly in the Racot region, represents a fascinating period in European prehistory that dates approximately between 5000 and 3400 BCE. This culture is part of the wider Neolithic transformation in Central Europe and is notable for its social complexity, artistic expression, and early agricultural practices. It is named after the village of Lengyel in Hungary, where key archaeological sites have been studied extensively.

Geographic and Temporal Context

The Lengyel Culture primarily stretched across parts of Central and Eastern Europe, encompassing areas of modern-day Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, and Slovenia. In the specific context of Racot, this culture was influenced by its geographical setting in what's today western Poland. This setting was critical for their subsistence strategies, societal organization, and interactions with neighboring cultures.

The timeframe of the Lengyel Culture coincided with significant climatic and environmental shifts, as Europe was gradually warming up after the last Ice Age. This transition facilitated agricultural expansion and the subsequent stabilization of human settlements.

Social and Political Structure

The Lengyel Culture is characterized by its complex social organization, which was more hierarchical compared to earlier Neolithic societies. Evidence from burial sites suggests a stratified society, as indicated by the varying richness of grave goods. These items, such as pottery, tools, and ornaments, appear to signify social status, implying a community with social differentiation possibly based on roles, wealth, or lineage.

Settlements were sometimes fortified, indicating a need for defense and implying a certain level of organized communal planning and leadership. This may suggest emerging forms of proto-political organization where decisions were likely made by elders or leaders, possibly ingrained in spiritual or ritualistic significance.

Economy and Subsistence

The Lengyel Culture was predominantly agrarian, engaging in early farming practices that included the cultivation of crops such as wheat, barley, and legumes. They also domesticated animals like cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats, which contributed to their diet and economy. This reliance on agriculture and animal husbandry marked a significant shift from the preceding hunter-gatherer lifestyles.

Supplementing their agrarian economy, Lengyel people also practiced hunting and gathering, which likely formed a smaller portion of their dietary practices but still played a role in their subsistence strategies, especially in times of crop failure or seasonal scarcity.

Art and Material Culture

Artistic expression is one of the hallmarks of the Lengyel Culture, most notably through their pottery. Lengyel ceramics are renowned for their fine craftsmanship, intricate designs, and painted decorations. The pottery often features geometric patterns, spirals, and sometimes simple figurative motifs, painted in black, red, or white on a polished surface.

Additionally, the Lengyel Culture is known for its use of personal adornments, including beads and pendants made from bone, shell, or copper, indicating a developed sense of aesthetics and possibly serving as status symbols.

Architecture and Settlement Patterns

Settlements during the Lengyel period were often strategically located near water sources and fertile land. The architectural structures were typically rectangular timber houses with thatched roofs, organized in either open or enclosed villages. Their construction methods reflect an understanding of local environmental conditions and available resources.

Some settlements were accompanied by circular or elliptical earthworks, possibly used for defensive purposes or as ceremonial centers, suggesting a complex relationship with the landscape and spiritual beliefs.

Religion and Rituals

Religion in the Lengyel Culture, like in many prehistoric societies, is a subject of interpretation based on archaeological evidence. Burial practices indicate a belief in an afterlife, with the deceased often accompanied by grave goods, suggesting that these items were considered necessary for the next world. Some graves show evidence of ritual feasting or offerings, indicative of complex ceremonial traditions.

While specific deities or mythological beliefs are not directly documented, the presence of enigmatic figurines and possibly ritualistic artifacts suggests a spiritual or religious system in which nature, fertility, and community ancestors likely played crucial roles.

Conclusion

The Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture in the Racot region embodies a critical phase of prehistoric development in Central Europe, characterized by advancements in social organization, art, and agriculture. Through archaeological findings, scholars can appreciate how these early Europeans adapted to their environment, developed intricate social structures, and laid the foundations for subsequent cultural developments. This culture, encapsulated by its material and spiritual legacies, underscores a transformative era in human history during the Neolithic period.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz236) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 61%
European Hunter-Gatherers 27%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 12%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz236) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 90%
Southern European 90%
Italian 36.5%
Sardinian 24.9%
Balkan 17.0%
Iberian 12.0%
Asia 9%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 7%
Arabian 7.2%
Northern West Asian 2%
Cypriot 1.8%
America 1%
America 1%
Native American 0.7%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample poz236 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

poz236,0.09986948,0.15673292,0.01513688,-0.05177288,0.0503956,-0.0239706,-0.00616528,0.00465192,0.04059348,0.0653608,-0.0018116,0.01030288,-0.01867256,-0.01432052,-0.01033824,0.00408064,0.01431836,-0.00063584,-0.00422252,-0.00288764,-0.001746,-0.00026248,-0.007274,-0.01678888,0.0041306
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025