A woman buried in Romania in the Chalcolithic era

buk010
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
buk010
Date:
5548 BCE - 5376 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
K1a5
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Sălcuța Culture
Location
Country:
Romania
Locality:
Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Sălcuța Culture is a significant archaeological culture that thrived during the Late Neolithic to Early Copper Age, approximately between 4500 and 3500 BCE. It is centered in the region of present-day southwestern Romania, primarily in the Oltenia area, near the Danube River. This culture is an essential component of the prehistoric development and cultural transitions in the Balkans and the broader Danubian region.

Geographical Setting

The Sălcuța Culture is predominantly located in the lower Danube Basin, an area characterized by fertile plains and access to vital waterways. This geographical setting facilitated agricultural development and trade, contributing to the culture’s prosperity and interaction with neighboring cultures. The proximity to the Danube River likely played a crucial role in the societal and economic structure, accommodating transportation, communication, and commerce.

Chronology and Development

The Sălcuța Culture emerges during the Late Neolithic period, transitioning into the Early Copper Age, a time marked by significant technological and societal advancements. It evolved from earlier Neolithic traditions and laid the groundwork for subsequent cultures, such as the Vădastra and Gumelnița cultures. The timeline indicates a dynamic period of cultural fusion and innovation, which stands crucial in understanding the spread of metallurgy and new subsistence strategies in Europe.

Material Culture

Pottery

One of the most distinctive features of the Sălcuța Culture is its pottery. The ceramics of this culture are typically well-crafted, with a variety of forms that include jars, bowls, and cups. The pottery often features intricate decorations, such as incised or stamped patterns, and sometimes paint, which showcase the aesthetic sensibilities and technical prowess of the artisans. These designs may have had symbolic or cultural significance, possibly related to ritualistic or communal activities.

Tools and Artifacts

The Sălcuța people utilized a wide range of tools made from stone, bone, and eventually, copper, as they were among the earlier adopters of metalworking technology. Flint was the predominant material for blades and cutting tools, while bone and antler were used for items such as awls and needles. The introduction of copper tools marks a pivotal shift in their technological landscape, heralding the onset of the Copper Age.

Figurines and Art

Archaeological findings from the Sălcuța Culture include anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figurines, which are believed to have religious or symbolic importance. These artifacts provide insight into the spiritual and possibly shamanistic practices of the community. The figurines often display stylized human or animal forms, suggesting a complex understanding of aesthetics and an intrinsic connection to their environment.

Economy and Subsistence

The economy of the Sălcuța Culture was primarily agrarian, relying heavily on farming and animal husbandry. They cultivated cereals, legumes, and various fruits, which constituted the staple diet of the population. The domestication of animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats provided meat, milk, and materials like wool and leather.

Fishing and hunting supplemented their diet and were integral to their subsistence strategy, supported by the rich biodiversity of the Danube River and surrounding forests.

Settlement Patterns

Sălcuța settlements were generally small, organized into clusters of semi-permanent or permanent dwellings. These settlements were strategically positioned to maximize access to arable land, water resources, and trade routes. Houses were typically constructed using materials such as wood, wattle, and daub, with thatched roofs. Excavations reveal a range of settlement sizes, suggesting a complex social structure with varying degrees of centralization and autonomy.

Social and Cultural Aspects

The social organization of the Sălcuța Culture, inferred from burial practices and settlement patterns, suggests a community-oriented society with emergent hierarchy forms. Funerary practices, including differing grave goods and burial positions, indicate social stratification and the potential existence of an elite or influential class.

The community was likely bound by shared belief systems and cultural practices, as indicated by the ritual significance of certain artifacts and communal structures. The art and symbolism found in their material culture suggest a rich tradition of storytelling, spirituality, and communal identity.

Interaction and Exchange

The Sălcuța Culture engaged in extensive interaction and exchange with adjacent cultural groups, such as the Gumelnița and Vinča cultures. Through these interactions, there was a significant exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies, fostering a dynamic cultural milieu that contributed to the diffusion of innovations like metallurgy and intensified agricultural practices.

Conclusion

The Sălcuța Culture represents a pivotal chapter in the prehistory of Eastern Europe, embodying the transitional dynamics from Neolithic traditions to more complex societal and technological paradigms. Its archaeological legacy provides essential insights into the development of early European societies, highlighting the intricate web of human adaptation, innovation, and interaction.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (buk010) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 82%
European Hunter-Gatherers 15%
Ancient Native Americans 3%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (buk010) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 77%
Southern European 77%
Italian 37.7%
Sardinian 27.6%
Balkan 10.2%
Iberian 1.5%
Asia 21%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 19%
Levantine 11.1%
Arabian 8.0%
Northern West Asian 2%
Cypriot 1.6%
Africa 2%
North African 2%
Egyptian 2.4%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample buk010 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

buk010,0.09593074,0.15553712,-0.00753444,-0.07251708,0.0341613,-0.03479872,-0.0040499,0.00098148,0.04343948,0.04836974,0.00233552,0.00240632,-0.00213504,-0.00876984,-0.01093302,0.0098128,0.00204748,0.00180324,0.00329682,0.00204308,0.00587876,0.00940332,-0.01190796,-0.01430594,0.00124471
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025