A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era

buk019
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
buk019
Date:
4984 BCE - 4784 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
K1a+195
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Boian Culture
Location
Country:
Romania
Locality:
Curătești
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Boian Culture, flourishing during the Neolithic and early Chalcolithic periods, is one of the significant prehistoric cultures of Southeast Europe, specifically in the region that is now modern-day Romania and parts of Bulgaria. It is named after the archaeological site of Boian, situated near Giurgiu, Romania, where key elements of this culture were first identified. The Boian Culture is an integral part of the pre-Thracian civilizations, providing insights into the development of later complex societies in the Balkans.

Chronology and Geography

The Boian Culture thrived approximately between 4300 and 3500 BCE, during the Middle to Late Neolithic period. It was primarily centered along the lower Danube River, taking advantage of fertile plains, abundant water resources, and favorable climatic conditions that promoted agricultural activities.

Settlements and Architecture

Boian settlements were typically medium-sized, often situated on fertile riverbanks and terraces. These sites varied from small villages to larger, more complex communities. The architecture primarily consisted of single-room, rectangular, or sometimes circular houses made of wattle and daub—a construction technique involving interwoven wooden strips covered with clay or mud. Thatch roofs and clay floors were common, with some structures featuring raised platforms for sleeping or storage.

Economy and Subsistence

The Boian people practiced a mixed economy involving agriculture, animal husbandry, hunting, and fishing. They cultivated a variety of crops, including wheat, barley, peas, and lentils, using primitive tools like stone sickles. Livestock such as cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs were domesticated and formed a crucial part of their diet and economy. Fishing and hunting supplemented their agricultural output, providing additional protein and raw materials.

Material Culture

Pottery

The Boian Culture is particularly noted for its pottery, which provides crucial insights into their aesthetic preferences, technological skills, and trade practices. Boian ceramics are characterized by their fine craftsmanship, with frequent use of black, graphite-painted, and incised motifs. Pottery forms range from simple bowls and jars to more elaborate vessels possibly used for ceremonial purposes.

Tools and Artifacts

Stone and bone tools were prevalent, with evidence of advanced flint knapping techniques. The Boian artisans created a variety of tools—axes, adzes, scrapers, and arrowheads—demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of their material properties. Bone tools included needles, awls, and decorative items, indicating both practical and social uses.

Social Structure and Burial Practices

While much about their social hierarchy remains speculative, the Boian Culture likely had a stratified society with emerging social complexity. Mortuary practices varied, with both inhumation and cremation evident at different sites. Grave goods found in burials suggest differential status among individuals, with richer burials containing pottery, tools, and ornaments indicative of higher social standing.

Art and Symbolism

Artistic expression in the Boian Culture is predominantly observed through their pottery and small figurines. These artifacts often depict human or animal forms, suggesting symbolic or spiritual significance. The motifs and styles may represent religious beliefs, cultural stories, or clan symbols, although their exact meanings remain elusive to modern interpretations.

Legacy and Transition

The Boian Culture eventually transitioned into the Gumelnița Culture around 3500 BCE, marking the further evolution of societal complexity in the region. Elements of Boian cultural practices, such as their pottery styles and agricultural practices, carried over into succeeding cultures, influencing the trajectory of prehistoric Southeast European societies.

In conclusion, the Boian Culture represents a vital phase in the prehistoric development of Southeast Europe, illustrating the adaptability and ingenuity of Neolithic communities. Its contributions to the agricultural, economic, and artistic advancements laid essential foundations for the future Thracian and other complex societies within the region.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (buk019) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 61%
European Hunter-Gatherers 22%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 14%
Ancient Asians 3%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (buk019) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 83%
Southern European 83%
Italian 31.7%
Iberian 23.7%
Sardinian 18.1%
Balkan 9.5%
Asia 12%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 6%
Arabian 5.8%
Northern West Asian 6%
Cypriot 4.0%
Anatolian 1.7%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 0%
Africa 5%
North African 5%
North African 5.4%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample buk019 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

buk019,0.08978564,0.156186,0.01028026,-0.05235388,0.04583054,-0.02310338,-0.0050252,0.00347048,0.03875144,0.05510018,-0.00156194,0.00799616,-0.01193106,-0.01071402,-0.00477918,0.00354258,0.00642086,-0.00098414,-0.0045166,-0.00226852,-0.00176316,0.0006512,-0.007698,-0.01352238,0.00395292
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025