A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era
The Lublin-Volhynian culture is an archaeological culture from the Neolithic era that existed primarily from around 3600 to 2600 BCE. This culture is part of the broader linear pottery cultures associated with the spread of farming communities across Central Europe, particularly in areas that are today part of Poland, Ukraine, and parts of Belarus. The culture derives its name from the Lublin region in modern Poland and Volhynia, which is now part of northwestern Ukraine.
Geographic Location and Environment:
The Lublin-Volhynian culture emerged in the fertile regions characterized by loess soils, which were ideal for agricultural practices that defined much of the Neolithic lifestyle. This geographical region consists of river valleys, notably along the Bug and Dniester rivers, providing water resources and enabling trade and communication with neighboring cultures.
Societal Structure:
The Lublin-Volhynian culture is characterized by its sedentary lifestyle, with communities living in permanent settlements. The population density was relatively low, with small to medium-sized villages. These settlements typically consisted of a few longhouses made of wood and clay, indicating a degree of communal living. The society likely had a hierarchical structure with some form of tribal leadership or council of elders, although evidence is more reliant on archaeological inferences than direct literary records.
Economy and Subsistence:
The economy was predominantly agrarian, relying on farming and animal husbandry. The people cultivated crops like emmer wheat, barley, peas, and flax. Livestock such as cattle, pigs, goats, and sheep were common, used both for meat and secondary products such as milk and wool. Agriculture was supported by the fertile soil and favorable climate of Central Europe during this period.
Material Culture and Artifacts:
One of the distinctive features of the Lublin-Volhynian culture is its pottery. The ceramics were often undecorated, with some instances of simple geometric designs, yet they were functional and well-crafted, suggesting a high level of skill. Tools made of flint, stone, bone, and antler were common, including sickles, axes, and knives, supporting their agricultural lifestyle.
Burial Practices:
Burial practices of the Lublin-Volhynian culture include both inhumation and cremation, with bodies often placed in a fetal position or on their sides in pits. Grave goods sometimes accompanied the deceased, including pottery, tools, and ornaments, indicating a belief in an afterlife and the importance of certain items in their cultural rituals.
Interactions and Trade:
The culture was not isolated; it engaged in trade with neighboring regions, which is evident from the presence of foreign materials such as obsidian and shells in archaeological sites. These interactions were facilitated by the geographic location along major river corridors, connecting them to other Neolithic cultures in Europe.
Religion and Beliefs:
Although direct evidence of religious practices is limited, it is inferred from burial practices that the Lublin-Volhynian culture had spiritual beliefs possibly related to ancestor worship or nature reverence. Artifacts such as figurines may suggest ritualistic or ceremonial activities.
Decline and Legacy:
The Lublin-Volhynian culture eventually transitioned or amalgamated into other succeeding cultures around 2600 BCE, influenced by the movement of peoples and changing environmental conditions. It forms a significant part of the Neolithic tapestry of Central Europe, contributing to the agricultural and societal developments that laid the groundwork for later Bronze Age cultures in the region.
Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz264) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.
Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (poz264) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.
These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.
The G25 coordinates for the sample poz264 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.
poz264,0.12218824,0.13286192,0.06058678,0.03460618,0.04528472,0.0132336,0.00661148,0.01087168,0.01505456,0.00537314,-0.00745626,0.00072932,0.003107,0.01324492,-0.006982,0.0055002,0.00256298,-0.0001621,0.00331506,4.894E-05,0.00112202,-8.03E-05,0.00252392,-0.00751182,-4.602E-05
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.