A woman buried in Hungary in the Middle Neolithic era

Overview

Polgár-Ferenci Hát, also known as M3-31, is a significant archaeological site located in northeastern Hungary. This site is an essential part of understanding the Middle Neolithic period in the Carpathian Basin, approximately spanning from 5500 to 4500 BCE. The site is particularly associated with the Linear Pottery Culture (Linearbandkeramik or LBK) and the subsequent Tisza Culture.

Archaeological Context

The Middle Neolithic period in Hungary is marked by the development of complex farming communities, extensive trade networks, and sophisticated material culture. Polgár-Ferenci Hát provides valuable insights into these transformative changes.

1. Inhabitants and Culture:

• Farming Communities: The inhabitants during this period were early agriculturalists who engaged in farming and animal husbandry.
• Linear Pottery Culture (LBK): The LBK culture is characterized by its distinctive pottery with linear decorations, longhouses, and early farming practices.
• Tisza Culture: This culture followed the LBK and is noted for its elaborate pottery, settlement structures, and burial practices.

2. Economic Activities:

• Agriculture: The primary subsistence strategy was farming, with crops such as wheat, barley, lentils, and peas being cultivated.
• Animal Husbandry: Domesticated animals, including cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs, played a significant role in their economy.
• Hunting and Gathering: Hunting and gathering continued to supplement their diet, providing additional resources.

Archaeological Findings

1. Artifacts:

• Pottery: Middle Neolithic pottery from Polgár-Ferenci Hát includes both utilitarian and decorative pieces. The ceramics often feature linear and curvilinear patterns.
• Stone Tools: The toolkit included polished stone axes, flint blades, and sickles. These tools were essential for agricultural activities and building.
• Bone and Antler Tools: Implements made from bone and antler, such as awls, needles, and decorative items, indicate a broad use of available materials.

2. Evidence of Habitation:

• House Structures: Excavations have revealed the foundations of longhouses, typical of the LBK and Tisza cultures. These structures were large, rectangular, timber-framed buildings that housed extended families.
• Storage Pits and Hearths: The presence of storage pits and hearths indicates activities such as food storage, processing, and cooking.

3. Environmental Adaptation:

• Landscape Use: The Neolithic inhabitants adapted the landscape for agriculture by clearing forests and creating fields. The fertile soils of the Carpathian Basin were ideal for farming.
• Resource Utilization: The region's natural resources, including water, wild game, and plant materials, were exploited to support the growing agricultural community.

Environmental and Geographic Context

1. Climate and Environment:

• Holocene Epoch: The Middle Neolithic period falls within the Holocene Epoch, characterized by a relatively stable and warm climate that supported the growth of agriculture and permanent settlements.
• Local Geography: Polgár-Ferenci Hát is situated in the Carpathian Basin, a region with fertile soils, abundant water sources, and a moderate climate, making it ideal for early farming communities.

2. Geographic Significance:

• Strategic Location: The site’s location near rivers and fertile land made it an ideal settlement for Neolithic farmers. The natural environment supported diverse subsistence activities and facilitated trade and interaction.

Social and Cultural Structure

1. Social Organization:

• Community Life: The Middle Neolithic communities were likely organized into extended family groups or clans. Social structures were centered around agricultural production and shared labor.
• Cultural Practices: The presence of decorated pottery and other artifacts indicates the development of cultural practices, including symbolic communication and possibly ritual activities.

2. Technological Innovations:

• Agricultural Tools: The development of polished stone tools, such as axes and sickles, facilitated the clearing of land for agriculture and the harvesting of crops.
• Pottery Production: The introduction of pottery represented a significant technological advancement, allowing for improved storage and cooking methods.

Significance of Polgár-Ferenci Hát

1. Archaeological Importance:

• Understanding Neolithic Life: Polgár-Ferenci Hát is crucial for understanding the Middle Neolithic period in the Carpathian Basin, providing evidence of the transition from early farming communities to more complex, settled societies.
• Evidence of Early Agriculture: The artifacts and remains found at the site offer valuable insights into the early development of agriculture and domestication in the region.

2. Contributions to Prehistory:

• Technological and Cultural Developments: The findings at Polgár-Ferenci Hát illustrate the technological innovations and cultural practices of Middle Neolithic communities, highlighting their adaptability and ingenuity.
• Regional Interactions: The site contributes to our understanding of regional interactions and trade networks during the Neolithic period, showcasing the interconnectedness of early farming communities.

Conclusion

Polgár-Ferenci Hát in Hungary is a key site for studying the Middle Neolithic period. The archaeological evidence from this site provides valuable insights into the lives of early farming communities, their technological innovations, and their adaptation to the environment. The findings from Polgár-Ferenci Hát enhance our understanding of the Neolithic period and the broader prehistoric context of Central Europe.

• Same Publication
• Same Culture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I1506) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I1506) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

The G25 coordinates for the sample I1506 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of European prehistory