A man buried in Hungary in the Bronze Age era

IR1
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
IR1
Date:
983 BCE - 831 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
G2a1
Y-DNA:
NO
Cultural Period:
Piliny-Kyjatice Culture
Location
Country:
Hungary
Locality:
Ludas-Varjú-dűlő (Heves County, Gyöngyös)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Piliny-Kyjatice Culture is a fascinating archaeological culture that is situated within the broader context of the Urnfield cultures of the Late Bronze Age in Central Europe. The Piliny and Kyjatice cultures are often considered as interconnected phases or regional manifestations of the larger Urnfield cultural complex. This culture is primarily located in what is now northern Hungary and southern Slovakia, flourishing approximately between 1300 BCE and 700 BCE. The culture is named after the sites at Piliny in Hungary and Kyjatice in Slovakia where significant archaeological discoveries have been made.

Geographic and Chronological Context

Geographic Extent

The Piliny-Kyjatice Culture predominately spreads across the Upper Tisza Basin, extending into areas that are now part of Slovakia. This region is characterized by its varied terrain, including fertile lowlands and forested highlands, providing diverse resources for prehistoric inhabitants. The natural boundaries formed by the rivers and mountains in the area played a significant role in shaping the settlement patterns.

Chronological Placement

The culture emerges during the Late Bronze Age, a period characterized by significant social and technological advancements. It marks an era when bronze became extensively used for tools, weapons, and ornaments. The integration into the Urnfield Culture, known for its distinctive cremation burial practices, marks a significant cultural and societal evolution during this time.

Cultural Characteristics

Settlements

The Piliny-Kyjatice Culture is known for extensive fortified settlements, usually located on hilltops or elevated terrains. These sites reveal that inhabitants placed a high value on defensible positions, which suggests concerns over security, possibly due to intergroup conflicts or external threats. Dwellings within these settlements were typically constructed using wood and clay, suggesting a semi-permanent residential pattern aligned with an agrarian lifestyle.

Economy and Subsistence

Agriculture played a critical role in the economy of the Piliny-Kyjatice Culture. The cultivation of cereals, such as wheat and barley, along with the rearing of domesticated animals, including cattle, pigs, and sheep, formed the subsistence base. Additionally, evidence of hunting and foraging indicates a diverse diet supplemented by wild fauna and flora.

Craftsmanship, particularly in metalwork, was highly developed. The production of bronze tools and ornaments indicates not only a proficiency in metalworking but also a well-established trade network that extended across Central and Eastern Europe. Pottery from this culture is of notable interest, characterized by well-made and decorated vessels that have been found in both domestic and burial contexts.

Burial Practices

One of the defining features of the Piliny-Kyjatice Culture is its funerary customs, which align with the broader Urnfield tradition of cremation. The deceased were cremated, and their remains were placed in urns, often accompanied by grave goods that included pottery, weapons, and personal ornaments. These funerary rites reflect complex beliefs surrounding death and the afterlife, where ancestors played a significant role in the social and religious spheres.

Art and Symbols

Artifacts from the Piliny-Kyjatice Culture showcase skilled artistry in metalwork and ceramics. Ornamentation often included geometric patterns, spirals, and motifs that may hold symbolic or decorative purposes. The designs on pottery and metal items suggest a complex aesthetic sense and possibly encoded cultural meanings.

Social Structure and Organization

The social hierarchy in the Piliny-Kyjatice Culture is inferred from burial customs and the distribution of wealth in grave goods. Evidence suggests the presence of a stratified society with elites who wielded control over resources and trade. The construction of fortifications indicates organized communal efforts, possibly under the leadership of chieftains or other authority figures.

Interaction with Neighboring Cultures

The Piliny-Kyjatice Culture was not isolated; rather, it was dynamic and interacted with neighboring cultures such as the Lusatian, Gáva, and the broader Urnfield continuum. These interactions are evident in the exchange of goods and ideas, which facilitated cultural advancements and technological innovations.

Legacy

The Piliny-Kyjatice Culture laid some of the foundational elements for the subsequent Iron Age cultures in the region. As the Bronze Age transitioned into the Iron Age, cultural and technological shifts led to further developments in social organization and material culture in Central Europe.

In summary, the Piliny-Kyjatice Culture is an exemplary representation of the Late Bronze Age societal and cultural formations in Central Europe. It provides crucial insights into the complexities of prehistoric human life, including social structure, economic practices, artistic development, and interactions with contemporary cultures.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I1504 Late Bronze Age Kyjatice Culture, Hungary 987 BCE Ludas-Varjú dűlő, Hungary View
I1506 The Linear Pottery Culture 5306 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I1503 Iron Age Pre-Scythian Culture, Hungary 983 BCE Ludas-Varju-Dulo, Hungary View
I1506 Middle Neolithic Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 5306 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I1502 2195 BCE Kompolt-Kigyoser, Hungary View
I1504 987 BCE Ludas-Varjú dűlő, Hungary View
I1497 3320 BCE Apc-Berekalya I, Hungary View
I1503 983 BCE Ludas-Varju-Dulo, Hungary View
I1507 5788 BCE Tiszaszolos-Domaháza, Hungary View
I1508 5716 BCE Berettyóújfalu-Morotva-Liget, Hungary View
I1495 4496 BCE Apc-Berekalya I, Hungary View
I1496 5211 BCE Apc-Berekalya I, Hungary View
I1502 2195 BCE Kompolt-Kigyoser, Hungary View
I1507 5788 BCE Tiszaszolos-Domaháza, Hungary View
I1496 5211 BCE Apc-Berekalya I, Hungary View
I1495 4496 BCE Apc-Berekalya I, Hungary View
I1497 3320 BCE Apc-Berekalya I, Hungary View
I1508 5716 BCE Berettyóújfalu-Morotva-Liget, Hungary View
I1506 5306 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I1498 5297 BCE Debrecen Tocopart Erdoalja, Hungary View
I1499 5286 BCE Garadna, Hungary View
I1505 5210 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I1500 5301 BCE Kompolt-Kigyoser, Hungary View
I1500 5301 BCE Kompolt-Kigyoser, Hungary View
I1498 5297 BCE Debrecen Tocopart Erdoalja, Hungary View
I1499 5286 BCE Garadna, Hungary View
I1505 5210 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
BR1 Early Bronze Age Makó Culture, Hungary 2195 BCE Kompolt-Kigyoser (Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County, Karcag), Hungary View
BR2 Piliny-Kyjatice Culture 987 BCE Ludas-Varjú-dűlő (Heves County, Gyöngyös), Hungary View
CO1 Baden Culture of Hungary 3320 BCE Apc-Berekalya-1 (Heves County, Hatvan), Hungary View
IR1 Piliny-Kyjatice Culture 983 BCE Ludas-Varjú-dűlő (Heves County, Gyöngyös), Hungary View
KO1 Early Neolithic Körös Culture, Hungary 5788 BCE Tiszaszőlős-Domaháza_unknown-site-2 (Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County, Tiszafüred), Hungary View
NE6 Middle Neolithic Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 5211 BCE Apc-Berekalya-1 (Heves County, Hatvan), Hungary View
NE7 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture, Hungary 4496 BCE Apc-Berekalya-1 (Heves County, Hatvan), Hungary View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
BR2 Piliny-Kyjatice Culture 987 BCE Ludas-Varjú-dűlő (Heves County, Gyöngyös), Hungary View
IR1 Piliny-Kyjatice Culture 983 BCE Ludas-Varjú-dűlő (Heves County, Gyöngyös), Hungary View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (IR1) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

European Hunter-Gatherers 32%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 29%
Neolithic Farmers 27%
Ancient Asians 9%
Ancient Oceanians 3%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (IR1) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 60%
Eastern European 31%
Eastern European 31.2%
Northwestern European 19%
Northwestern European 8.5%
Finnish 4.4%
Scandinavian 3.8%
English 2.1%
Southern European 10%
Iberian 6.2%
Italian 2.2%
Sardinian 1.5%
Asia 36%
Northern West Asian 35%
Caucasian 26.6%
Mesopotamian 8.1%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 1%
Arabian 1.1%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 0%
America 2%
America 2%
Native American 2.1%
Oceania 2%
Melanesian 2%
Papuan 1.7%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample IR1 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

IR1,0.11331144,0.0885478,0.02031948,0.0281286,-0.00400556,0.0094585,-0.00096484,-0.00649606,-0.01507244,-0.00987592,-0.00125362,0.00279492,-0.00462904,-0.00771624,0.00516194,0.0009404,-0.00231688,-0.00080288,-6.506E-05,-0.00201744,-0.00080758,0.00018474,-0.00046288,0.00348434,-0.00126233
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of European prehistory
Authors:
Gamba C, Jones ER, Teasdale MD
Abstract:

The Great Hungarian Plain was a crossroads of cultural transformations that have shaped European prehistory. Here we analyse a 5,000-year transect of human genomes, sampled from petrous bones giving consistently excellent endogenous DNA yields, from 13 Hungarian Neolithic, Copper, Bronze and Iron Age burials including two to high (~22 × ) and seven to ~1 × coverage, to investigate the impact of these on Europe's genetic landscape. These data suggest genomic shifts with the advent of the Neolithic, Bronze and Iron Ages, with interleaved periods of genome stability. The earliest Neolithic context genome shows a European hunter-gatherer genetic signature and a restricted ancestral population size, suggesting direct contact between cultures after the arrival of the first farmers into Europe. The latest, Iron Age, sample reveals an eastern genomic influence concordant with introduced Steppe burial rites. We observe transition towards lighter pigmentation and surprisingly, no Neolithic presence of lactase persistence.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025