A man buried in Kazakhstan in the Iron Age era

MJ-53
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
MJ-53
Date:
393 BCE - 206 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
U5b2b
Y-DNA:
R-L23
Cultural Period:
Tasmola Culture in Kazakhstan
Location
Country:
Kazakhstan
Locality:
Nurken-2. Mound 6
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Tasmola Culture, also known as the Tasmola period, is an archaeological culture that emerged during the early Iron Age, roughly spanning from the 7th to the 3rd century BCE, in the central region of Kazakhstan. This culture is named after the Tasmola burial sites found in the Sary-Arka region, particularly in the Karaganda area. The Tasmola Culture represents an essential phase in the history of the steppe nomads and provides valuable insights into the lifestyle, social organization, and material culture of the ancient pastoral communities inhabiting the vast Eurasian steppes.

Geography and Environment

The Tasmola Culture developed in the central part of Kazakhstan, a region characterized by open steppe landscapes, rolling hills, and sparse vegetation. The environment of the area played a crucial role in shaping the lifestyle of the Tasmola people. The steppe was suitable for pastoralism, providing ample grazing land for livestock such as horses, sheep, and cattle, which were central to the nomadic economy.

Social and Political Organization

The Tasmola Culture is indicative of a society that was largely nomadic and organized into tribes or clans. Evidence from burial sites suggests some degree of social stratification, with elite members of society being buried with a variety of grave goods, indicating distinctions in status and wealth. The presence of weapons, jewelry, and horse tack in some burials points to the importance of warfare, horsemanship, and possibly the emergence of warrior elites.

Burial Practices

One of the most distinctive features of the Tasmola Culture is its burial practices. The Tasmola sites are notable for their kurgans, or burial mounds, which often contain stone constructions and circular stone enclosures. These kurgans vary significantly in size, with the larger ones likely belonging to more prominent individuals or families. Burials often include human remains accompanied by grave goods such as pottery, weapons, animal bones, and ornaments, which reflect the deceased's status and the beliefs about the afterlife.

Economy and Subsistence

The economy of the Tasmola Culture was largely based on nomadic pastoralism, with a heavy reliance on livestock. Horses were particularly important, both as a means of transportation and as a symbol of wealth and power. The equestrian lifestyle facilitated mobility across the vast steppe, enabling effective herding and trade with neighboring cultures. There is also evidence of some limited agriculture and gathering of wild plants, but pastoralism remained the primary economic activity.

Art and Material Culture

The material culture of the Tasmola people included a variety of artifacts that have been uncovered through archaeological excavations. These include pottery, metal objects, stone implements, and personal ornaments. Pottery from this culture is typically hand-made and undecorated, reflecting utilitarian uses. Metal artifacts, particularly those made of bronze and iron, demonstrate advanced metallurgical skills and include weapons, tools, and decorative items.

Interaction and Influence

The Tasmola Culture was not isolated but had interactions with neighboring cultures and peoples across the Eurasian steppe. These interactions were likely facilitated by the trade networks that crossed the steppe and connected the East and West. The Tasmola Culture is part of the broader Scythian-Saka cultural horizon, sharing similarities in art, burial practices, and economic activities. Such connections indicate a flow of ideas, goods, and people across the vast expanse of Central Asia.

Conclusion

The Tasmola Culture represents a dynamic and significant period in the history of the Eurasian steppe. Its contributions to our understanding of early Iron Age nomadic societies are invaluable, highlighting the complexities of social organization, economic practices, and cultural interactions on the steppes of Kazakhstan. The legacy of the Tasmola Culture is reflected in the rich archaeological record it left behind, offering insight into the lives and beliefs of its people and their lasting impact on the region's historical trajectory.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
MJ-34 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 386 BCE Kolomak hillfort. №1842. pit 68. excavation IV, Ukraine View
MJ-12 Cimmerian Culture, Ukraine 990 BCE Cartal III. NW part of the burial ground. plot I. grave 101, Ukraine View
MJ-16 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 755 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 6/1, Ukraine View
MJ-13 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 750 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 3, Ukraine View
MJ-31 Cimmerian Culture, Ukraine 1284 BCE Dykyi Sad hillfort. "Citadel". Room №7 in the "Citadel, Ukraine View
MJ-19 Chernyakhiv Culture, Ukraine 261 CE Legedzine. Grave 20, Ukraine View
MJ-09 Bronze Age Catacomb Culture, Ukraine 2461 BCE Mamai-Gora. The central sector of the burial. Mound 162. burial 15. skeleton 2, Ukraine View
MJ-46 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 366 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 165. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-06 Early Bronze Age Yamnaya Culture, Ukraine 2865 BCE Kumy. Mound 6. burial 8, Ukraine View
MJ-35 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 751 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 1, Ukraine View
MJ-37 Chernyakhiv Culture, Ukraine 248 CE Shyshaky. Grave 112 in the central part of the burial ground, Ukraine View
MJ-08 Late Srubnaya Culture, Ukraine 775 BCE Kumy. Mound 1. burial 2, Ukraine View
MJ-14 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 778 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 22/1, Ukraine View
MJ-33 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 758 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 18/1, Ukraine View
MJ-47 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 725 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 175. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-36 Chernyakhiv Culture, Ukraine 247 CE Komariv-1. Grave 3, Ukraine View
MJ-44 Middle Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 367 BCE Chumarovo-1. Mound 10. burial 10, Russia View
MJ-41 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 749 BCE Avlasovo. Mound 3. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-42 Eastern Scythian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 793 BCE Nikolaevka II. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-43 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 413 BCE Sibai-1. Mound 1. burial 1. skeleton 2, Russia View
LS-13 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 481 BCE Novo-Muraptalovo-7. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-56 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 727 BCE Perevolochan-2. Mound 4. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-39 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 387 BCE Ivanovka-1. Mound 5. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-38 Sarmatian Culture, Russia 162 BCE Zolka. Mound 4. burial 30, Russia View
MJ-40 Eastern Scythian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 396 BCE Manhar-2. Burial 1, Russia View
I3867 Early Iron Age Kazakhstan 750 BCE Almaty. Talgar. Birlik, Kazakhstan View
MJ-51 Saka Culture in Kazakhstan 775 BCE Taldy-2. Mound 4, Kazakhstan View
MJ-52 Tasmola Culture in Kazakhstan 795 BCE Aksu-Ayuly-4. Mound 3, Kazakhstan View
MJ-53 Tasmola Culture in Kazakhstan 393 BCE Nurken-2. Mound 6, Kazakhstan View
MJ-15 Iron Age Western Scythian-Cimmerian Culture, Ukraine 393 BCE Bidylo I. Mound 2. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-15 393 BCE Bidylo I. Mound 2. burial 1, Ukraine View
I3867 750 BCE Almaty. Talgar. Birlik, Kazakhstan View
LS-13 481 BCE Novo-Muraptalovo-7. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-06 2865 BCE Kumy. Mound 6. burial 8, Ukraine View
MJ-08 775 BCE Kumy. Mound 1. burial 2, Ukraine View
MJ-09 2461 BCE Mamai-Gora. The central sector of the burial. Mound 162. burial 15. skeleton 2, Ukraine View
MJ-12 990 BCE Cartal III. NW part of the burial ground. plot I. grave 101, Ukraine View
MJ-13 750 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 3, Ukraine View
MJ-14 778 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 22/1, Ukraine View
MJ-15 393 BCE St Merchik. Group II. mound 1. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-16 755 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 6/1, Ukraine View
MJ-19 261 CE Legedzine. Grave 20, Ukraine View
MJ-31 1284 BCE Dykyi Sad hillfort. "Citadel". Room №7 in the "Citadel, Ukraine View
MJ-33 758 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 18/1, Ukraine View
MJ-34 386 BCE Kolomak hillfort. №1842. pit 68. excavation IV, Ukraine View
MJ-35 751 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 1, Ukraine View
MJ-36 247 CE Komariv-1. Grave 3, Ukraine View
MJ-37 248 CE Shyshaky. Grave 112 in the central part of the burial ground, Ukraine View
MJ-38 162 BCE Zolka. Mound 4. burial 30, Russia View
MJ-39 387 BCE Ivanovka-1. Mound 5. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-40 396 BCE Manhar-2. Burial 1, Russia View
MJ-41 749 BCE Avlasovo. Mound 3. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-42 793 BCE Nikolaevka II. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-43 413 BCE Sibai-1. Mound 1. burial 1. skeleton 2, Russia View
MJ-44 367 BCE Chumarovo-1. Mound 10. burial 10, Russia View
MJ-46 366 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 165. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-47 725 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 175. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-51 775 BCE Taldy-2. Mound 4, Kazakhstan View
MJ-52 795 BCE Aksu-Ayuly-4. Mound 3, Kazakhstan View
MJ-53 393 BCE Nurken-2. Mound 6, Kazakhstan View
MJ-56 727 BCE Perevolochan-2. Mound 4. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-15 393 BCE St Merchik. Group II. mound 1. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-15-32_merge Scythian Culture 393 BCE Staryi-Merchik-2 (Kharkiv Oblast, Bohodukhiv District, Valkiv municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
MJ-52 Tasmola Culture in Kazakhstan 795 BCE Aksu-Ayuly-4. Mound 3, Kazakhstan View
MJ-53 Tasmola Culture in Kazakhstan 393 BCE Nurken-2. Mound 6, Kazakhstan View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (MJ-53) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Ancient Asians 49%
Neolithic Farmers 31%
Ancient Oceanians 11%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 8%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (MJ-53) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 51%
Southern European 23%
Italian 20.8%
Sardinian 1.9%
Eastern European 16%
Eastern European 16.3%
Northwestern European 12%
Northwestern European 12.4%
Asia 41%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 18%
Central Asian 17.8%
Northern Asian 12%
Siberian 11.6%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 11%
Chinese 11.0%
America 8%
America 8%
Native American 7.8%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample MJ-53 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

MJ-53,0.0887012,-0.04264418,0.00607374,0.00319028,-0.00770076,0.01017622,0.00481038,0.00438488,-0.01981928,-0.01021796,-0.00075534,0.00038072,-0.00710048,-0.01334342,0.00306774,-0.01058384,-0.00249824,-0.00116742,0.00230692,0.00578292,0.00058752,0.00967048,0.01005802,-0.00566722,-0.00259816
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Shifts in the Genetic Landscape of the Western Eurasian Steppe Associated with the Beginning and End of the Scythian Dominance
Authors:
Järve M, Saag L, Scheib CL
Abstract:

The Early Iron Age nomadic Scythians have been described as a confederation of tribes of different origins, based on ancient DNA evidence [1-3]. It is still unclear how much of the Scythian dominance in the Eurasian Steppe was due to movements of people and how much reflected cultural diffusion and elite dominance. We present new whole-genome sequences of 31 ancient Western and Eastern Steppe individuals, including Scythians as well as samples pre- and postdating them, allowing us to set the Scythians in a temporal context (in the Western, i.e., Ponto-Caspian Steppe). We detect an increase of eastern (Altaian) affinity along with a decrease in eastern hunter-gatherer (EHG) ancestry in the Early Iron Age Ponto-Caspian gene pool at the start of the Scythian dominance. On the other hand, samples of the Chernyakhiv culture postdating the Scythians in Ukraine have a significantly higher proportion of Near Eastern ancestry than other samples of this study. Our results agree with the Gothic source of the Chernyakhiv culture and support the hypothesis that the Scythian dominance did involve a demic component.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025