A woman buried in Ukraine in the Bronze Age era

MJ-09
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
MJ-09
Date:
2461 BCE - 2205 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
H13a2c
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Bronze Age Catacomb Culture, Ukraine
Location
Country:
Ukraine
Locality:
Mamai-Gora. The central sector of the burial. Mound 162. burial 15. skeleton 2
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Bronze Age Catacomb Culture, prevalent in the region that is now Ukraine, is a fascinating and significant archaeological culture that thrived approximately between 2800 and 1700 BCE. It is part of the broader phenomenon of the Indo-European migrations and developments, contributing to the formation of early European civilizations.

Geographic and Chronological Context

The Catacomb Culture originated and spread across the Pontic-Caspian steppe and into parts of Eastern Europe, covering areas of modern-day Ukraine, Russia, and Moldova. It flourished during the Middle and Late Bronze Age, succeeding the Yamnaya culture and preceding the Srubna culture, thus playing a crucial bridging role in the region's prehistoric development.

Cultural Characteristics and Artifacts

The culture is primarily named after its distinctive burial practices. The people of the Catacomb Culture buried their dead in deep, underground burial chambers, or catacombs, which were cut into the ground and often accessed by a shaft. These burial chambers were typically designed to resemble a house, reflecting the belief in an afterlife similar to earthly life. Some graves contained evidence of wooden structures or roofs within the catacombs, indicating complex construction techniques and a symbolic representation of domestic spaces.

Artifacts from Catacomb Culture sites include pottery, tools, and weapons. Pottery is usually characterized by its simple, geometric decorations and practical shapes, likely used for both domestic purposes and ritualistic offerings in burial contexts. Metalworking advances are evident from the presence of bronze tools and weapons, including axes, daggers, and spearheads, indicating both everyday utility and communal defense or status symbols. These reflect the burgeoning skills in metallurgy and an evolving hierarchy within the society.

Socio-Economic Structure

The Catacomb Culture was primarily pastoral, with evidence of sheep, goat, and cattle breeding playing central roles in their economy. There is also evidence of transhumance, where communities moved seasonally with their herds. This semi-nomadic lifestyle is complemented by evidence of some agricultural practice, possibly in river valleys, demonstrating an adaptive strategy to their environment.

Social organization within the Catacomb Culture appears to have been tribal, with a possible emerging stratification hinted at by grave goods' differentiation. Some graves, likely those of tribal leaders or warriors, contain richer assemblages of goods, suggesting the beginning of social hierarchies.

Indo-European Connections

As part of the broader spread of Indo-European languages and cultures, the Catacomb Culture contributes to our understanding of these ancient people who eventually spread across much of Europe and Asia. Linguistic analyses suggest that Proto-Indo-European languages likely influenced or evolved among these communities, offering insights into the migration and interaction patterns across vast regions.

Legacy and Influence

The Catacomb Culture's legacy is seen in its impact on succeeding cultures in the region, particularly the Srubna Culture, which inherited and adapted many of its predecessor's cultural elements. Its burial traditions, metallurgical practices, and social structures provided a foundation that influenced later developments in Eastern European prehistory.

In archaeological studies, the Catacomb Culture is crucial for understanding the complex web of cultural interactions that defined the Bronze Age in Eastern Europe. Its study provides a window into the diffusion of technologies, socio-political changes, and the spread of Indo-European languages, offering invaluable insights into one of Europe's formative prehistoric epochs.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
MJ-34 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 386 BCE Kolomak hillfort. №1842. pit 68. excavation IV, Ukraine View
MJ-12 Cimmerian Culture, Ukraine 990 BCE Cartal III. NW part of the burial ground. plot I. grave 101, Ukraine View
MJ-16 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 755 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 6/1, Ukraine View
MJ-13 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 750 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 3, Ukraine View
MJ-31 Cimmerian Culture, Ukraine 1284 BCE Dykyi Sad hillfort. "Citadel". Room №7 in the "Citadel, Ukraine View
MJ-19 Chernyakhiv Culture, Ukraine 261 CE Legedzine. Grave 20, Ukraine View
MJ-09 Bronze Age Catacomb Culture, Ukraine 2461 BCE Mamai-Gora. The central sector of the burial. Mound 162. burial 15. skeleton 2, Ukraine View
MJ-46 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 366 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 165. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-06 Early Bronze Age Yamnaya Culture, Ukraine 2865 BCE Kumy. Mound 6. burial 8, Ukraine View
MJ-35 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 751 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 1, Ukraine View
MJ-37 Chernyakhiv Culture, Ukraine 248 CE Shyshaky. Grave 112 in the central part of the burial ground, Ukraine View
MJ-08 Late Srubnaya Culture, Ukraine 775 BCE Kumy. Mound 1. burial 2, Ukraine View
MJ-14 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 778 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 22/1, Ukraine View
MJ-33 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 758 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 18/1, Ukraine View
MJ-47 Iron Age Western Scythian Culture, Ukraine 725 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 175. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-36 Chernyakhiv Culture, Ukraine 247 CE Komariv-1. Grave 3, Ukraine View
MJ-44 Middle Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 367 BCE Chumarovo-1. Mound 10. burial 10, Russia View
MJ-41 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 749 BCE Avlasovo. Mound 3. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-42 Eastern Scythian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 793 BCE Nikolaevka II. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-43 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 413 BCE Sibai-1. Mound 1. burial 1. skeleton 2, Russia View
LS-13 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 481 BCE Novo-Muraptalovo-7. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-56 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 727 BCE Perevolochan-2. Mound 4. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-39 Early Sarmatian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 387 BCE Ivanovka-1. Mound 5. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-38 Sarmatian Culture, Russia 162 BCE Zolka. Mound 4. burial 30, Russia View
MJ-40 Eastern Scythian Culture, Southern Urals, Russia 396 BCE Manhar-2. Burial 1, Russia View
I3867 Early Iron Age Kazakhstan 750 BCE Almaty. Talgar. Birlik, Kazakhstan View
MJ-51 Saka Culture in Kazakhstan 775 BCE Taldy-2. Mound 4, Kazakhstan View
MJ-52 Tasmola Culture in Kazakhstan 795 BCE Aksu-Ayuly-4. Mound 3, Kazakhstan View
MJ-53 Tasmola Culture in Kazakhstan 393 BCE Nurken-2. Mound 6, Kazakhstan View
MJ-15 Iron Age Western Scythian-Cimmerian Culture, Ukraine 393 BCE Bidylo I. Mound 2. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-15 393 BCE Bidylo I. Mound 2. burial 1, Ukraine View
I3867 750 BCE Almaty. Talgar. Birlik, Kazakhstan View
LS-13 481 BCE Novo-Muraptalovo-7. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-06 2865 BCE Kumy. Mound 6. burial 8, Ukraine View
MJ-08 775 BCE Kumy. Mound 1. burial 2, Ukraine View
MJ-09 2461 BCE Mamai-Gora. The central sector of the burial. Mound 162. burial 15. skeleton 2, Ukraine View
MJ-12 990 BCE Cartal III. NW part of the burial ground. plot I. grave 101, Ukraine View
MJ-13 750 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 3, Ukraine View
MJ-14 778 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 22/1, Ukraine View
MJ-15 393 BCE St Merchik. Group II. mound 1. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-16 755 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 6/1, Ukraine View
MJ-19 261 CE Legedzine. Grave 20, Ukraine View
MJ-31 1284 BCE Dykyi Sad hillfort. "Citadel". Room №7 in the "Citadel, Ukraine View
MJ-33 758 BCE Medwin. Group I. mound 18/1, Ukraine View
MJ-34 386 BCE Kolomak hillfort. №1842. pit 68. excavation IV, Ukraine View
MJ-35 751 BCE Kup'evaha. Mound 25. burial 1. skeleton 1, Ukraine View
MJ-36 247 CE Komariv-1. Grave 3, Ukraine View
MJ-37 248 CE Shyshaky. Grave 112 in the central part of the burial ground, Ukraine View
MJ-38 162 BCE Zolka. Mound 4. burial 30, Russia View
MJ-39 387 BCE Ivanovka-1. Mound 5. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-40 396 BCE Manhar-2. Burial 1, Russia View
MJ-41 749 BCE Avlasovo. Mound 3. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-42 793 BCE Nikolaevka II. Mound 1. burial 2, Russia View
MJ-43 413 BCE Sibai-1. Mound 1. burial 1. skeleton 2, Russia View
MJ-44 367 BCE Chumarovo-1. Mound 10. burial 10, Russia View
MJ-46 366 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 165. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-47 725 BCE Mamai-Gora. The eastern sector of the burial. Object 175. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-51 775 BCE Taldy-2. Mound 4, Kazakhstan View
MJ-52 795 BCE Aksu-Ayuly-4. Mound 3, Kazakhstan View
MJ-53 393 BCE Nurken-2. Mound 6, Kazakhstan View
MJ-56 727 BCE Perevolochan-2. Mound 4. burial 3, Russia View
MJ-15 393 BCE St Merchik. Group II. mound 1. burial 1, Ukraine View
MJ-15-32_merge Scythian Culture 393 BCE Staryi-Merchik-2 (Kharkiv Oblast, Bohodukhiv District, Valkiv municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
MJ-09 Bronze Age Catacomb Culture, Ukraine 2461 BCE Mamai-Gora. The central sector of the burial. Mound 162. burial 15. skeleton 2, Ukraine View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (MJ-09) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Western Steppe Pastoralists 46%
European Hunter-Gatherers 27%
Neolithic Farmers 22%
Ancient Asians 6%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (MJ-09) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 72%
Northwestern European 42%
English 16.8%
Finnish 14.7%
Northwestern European 10.6%
Eastern European 30%
Eastern European 30.4%
Asia 28%
Northern West Asian 25%
Caucasian 24.7%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 3%
Pakistan 2.8%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample MJ-09 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

MJ-09,0.11781282,0.08805286,0.03479974,0.041545,-0.00028604,0.01801594,0.00988702,0.00684262,-0.02192262,-0.02942262,0.001275,-0.0007264,0.00425162,-0.00121274,0.00262728,-0.001557,-0.00399176,-0.00045028,-0.00143928,-0.00406142,0.00126658,0.00108798,-0.00225504,0.00936826,-0.00081503
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Shifts in the Genetic Landscape of the Western Eurasian Steppe Associated with the Beginning and End of the Scythian Dominance
Authors:
Järve M, Saag L, Scheib CL
Abstract:

The Early Iron Age nomadic Scythians have been described as a confederation of tribes of different origins, based on ancient DNA evidence [1-3]. It is still unclear how much of the Scythian dominance in the Eurasian Steppe was due to movements of people and how much reflected cultural diffusion and elite dominance. We present new whole-genome sequences of 31 ancient Western and Eastern Steppe individuals, including Scythians as well as samples pre- and postdating them, allowing us to set the Scythians in a temporal context (in the Western, i.e., Ponto-Caspian Steppe). We detect an increase of eastern (Altaian) affinity along with a decrease in eastern hunter-gatherer (EHG) ancestry in the Early Iron Age Ponto-Caspian gene pool at the start of the Scythian dominance. On the other hand, samples of the Chernyakhiv culture postdating the Scythians in Ukraine have a significantly higher proportion of Near Eastern ancestry than other samples of this study. Our results agree with the Gothic source of the Chernyakhiv culture and support the hypothesis that the Scythian dominance did involve a demic component.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025