A man buried in Lithuania in the Mesolithic era

The Mesolithic era in Lithuania, a part of the broader Mesolithic period in Europe, represents a fascinating chapter in the prehistory of the region, spanning approximately from 10,000 to 5,000 BCE. During this time, the climate warmed following the end of the last Ice Age, leading to significant environmental and ecological transformations. This period is characterized by the adaptation of human communities to the post-glacial environment, the development of new tools and technologies, and changes in social organization.
Environment and Ecology
With the retreat of the glacial ice, Lithuania experienced substantial changes in its landscape. Dense forests began to spread across the region, interspersed with lakes, rivers, and wetlands. These forests were primarily composed of pine, birch, and hazel, gradually giving way to oak and alder as the climate continued to warm. The abundance of water bodies and the diverse ecosystems provided rich resources for human habitation. This setting fostered a range of plant and animal life, including large game like aurochs and elk, smaller animals such as beavers and otters, and a variety of fish and bird species.
Subsistence Strategies
The Mesolithic inhabitants of Lithuania were primarily hunter-gatherers, a lifestyle well-suited to the rich environment. They exploited both terrestrial and aquatic resources. Hunting was integral to their subsistence, with evidence suggesting the use of bows and arrows, spears, and later, domesticated dogs to track and hunt game. Fishing also played a critical role, supported by the development of fishing nets, traps, and dugout canoes. The region's rivers and lakes were teeming with fish, including species like pike, perch, and sturgeon. Gathering complemented these activities, with Mesolithic communities collecting nuts, berries, roots, and other plant materials provided by the bountiful forests.
Tools and Technology
Technological advancement during the Mesolithic period is marked by the development of microlithic tools. These small, often geometric flint blades and points were used to create composite tools. By hafting microliths onto wooden shafts or bone handles, a range of versatile tools for hunting, fishing, and processing food were produced. The Mesolithic toolkit also included axes and adzes for woodworking, an essential skill for constructing canoes and other wooden implements necessary for life in a forested and water-rich environment.
Settlements and Social Organization
Settlement patterns during the Mesolithic in Lithuania were typically semi-nomadic. Communities moved seasonally to exploit different resources, with winter camps close to reliable resources like fishing spots and summer camps situated to take advantage of migrating game and seasonal plant abundance. Archaeological sites from this period often reveal evidence of temporary structures, hearths, and refuse pits.
While definitive details of social organization are elusive, evidence suggests small, kin-based groups. The distribution of resources and cooperation likely necessitated some form of social hierarchy or leadership, though these communities were probably egalitarian in comparison to later Neolithic societies.
Art and Spiritual Life
Material culture from this period includes personal ornaments such as amber and bone pendants, which suggest a symbolic or aesthetic dimension to Mesolithic life. Rock carvings and portable art, although less prevalent than in the Upper Paleolithic, may have had ritualistic or communicative functions. Burial practices provide further insights, with some Mesolithic burials indicating the use of ochre and the inclusion of grave goods, hinting at complex belief systems surrounding death and an afterlife.
Legacy and Transition
The Mesolithic era laid crucial groundwork for the subsequent Neolithic period. The skills and practices developed during this time, such as fishing, woodworking, and tool-making, were vital for later agricultural societies. The gradual shift towards sedentism and farming in the Neolithic would transform these communities, but the Mesolithic period remains a foundational epoch in the history of human adaptation and survival in the post-glacial landscapes of Northern Europe.
In conclusion, Mesolithic Lithuania represents a dynamic period of human innovation and adaptation. Despite the challenges posed by a shifting environment, the people of this era effectively utilized the resources available to them, showcasing remarkable resilience and ingenuity.
Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (DON005) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.
Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (DON005) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.
These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.
The G25 coordinates for the sample DON005 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.
DON005,0.13429,0.1211218,0.07256542,0.0710936,0.03953562,0.03155458,0.00801768,0.0131551,0.00186342,-0.02159278,-0.00620604,-0.00340952,0.01307434,0.01459222,-0.0002243,0.00354682,-0.00193236,-0.00071814,0.00349874,0.0015076,0.00283522,-0.00171538,0.0038181,0.0040214,-0.00115055
Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers
Modern humans have populated Europe for more than 45,000 years1,2. Our knowledge of the genetic relatedness and structure of ancient hunter-gatherers is however limited, owing to the scarceness and poor molecular preservation of human remains from that period3. Here we analyse 356 ancient hunter-gatherer genomes, including new genomic data for 116 individuals from 14 countries in western and central Eurasia, spanning between 35,000 and 5,000 years ago. We identify a genetic ancestry profile in individuals associated with Upper Palaeolithic Gravettian assemblages from western Europe that is distinct from contemporaneous groups related to this archaeological culture in central and southern Europe4, but resembles that of preceding individuals associated with the Aurignacian culture. This ancestry profile survived during the Last Glacial Maximum (25,000 to 19,000 years ago) in human populations from southwestern Europe associated with the Solutrean culture, and with the following Magdalenian culture that re-expanded northeastward after the Last Glacial Maximum. Conversely, we reveal a genetic turnover in southern Europe suggesting a local replacement of human groups around the time of the Last Glacial Maximum, accompanied by a north-to-south dispersal of populations associated with the Epigravettian culture. From at least 14,000 years ago, an ancestry related to this culture spread from the south across the rest of Europe, largely replacing the Magdalenian-associated gene pool. After a period of limited admixture that spanned the beginning of the Mesolithic, we find genetic interactions between western and eastern European hunter-gatherers, who were also characterized by marked differences in phenotypically relevant variants.