A woman buried in Vietnam in the Neolithic era

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (Vt719) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.
Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (Vt719) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.
These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.
The G25 coordinates for the sample Vt719 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.
Vt719,0.02008024,-0.41623826,-0.04247556,-0.05912572,0.11099856,0.0589558,-0.00040478,-0.0045181,-0.01677952,-0.00905226,0.00476108,0.00129852,0.00320416,-0.00894528,0.00191158,0.00228298,0.00807602,-0.00341702,-0.00212942,-0.01252848,0.0118486,0.0108614,0.01682568,0.00374876,0.00586757
The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia
The human occupation history of Southeast Asia (SEA) remains heavily debated. Current evidence suggests that SEA was occupied by Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers until ~4000 years ago, when farming economies developed and expanded, restricting foraging groups to remote habitats. Some argue that agricultural development was indigenous; others favor the "two-layer" hypothesis that posits a southward expansion of farmers giving rise to present-day Southeast Asian genetic diversity. By sequencing 26 ancient human genomes (25 from SEA, 1 Japanese Jōmon), we show that neither interpretation fits the complexity of Southeast Asian history: Both Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers and East Asian farmers contributed to current Southeast Asian diversity, with further migrations affecting island SEA and Vietnam. Our results help resolve one of the long-standing controversies in Southeast Asian prehistory.