A man buried in Laos in the Late Neolithic To Bronze Age era

La364
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
La364
Date:
1125 BCE - 926 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
F1a1a1
Y-DNA:
O-B426
Cultural Period:
Late Neolithic to Bronze Age Laos
Location
Country:
Laos
Locality:
Northeast Huapan. Tam Pa Ping
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The transition from the Late Neolithic to the Bronze Age in Laos is a fascinating period that encapsulates significant cultural, technological, and societal transformations. This era in Southeast Asian history marks a critical juncture where prehistoric communities began adopting advancements that would lay the groundwork for subsequent civilizations. Let's explore this transitional phase in detail.

Geography and Environment

Laos, located in the heart of the Indochina Peninsula, is characterized by its rugged terrains, extensive river systems, and fertile valleys. During the Late Neolithic to Bronze Age, these geographic features would have significantly influenced settlement patterns and subsistence strategies. The Mekong River, in particular, served as a crucial artery for trade, communication, and transportation, linking various communities within the region and beyond.

Societal Organization

In the Late Neolithic period, Laos was primarily composed of small, kin-based groups practicing subsistence agriculture, hunting, and gathering. As people began transitioning into the Bronze Age, evidence suggests the emergence of more complex societal structures. Hierarchical organization started to appear, potentially led by chieftains or tribal leaders. These communities were likely organized around extended families or clans, involved in both agricultural practices and craft specialization.

Technological and Agricultural Advances

The Late Neolithic period in Laos saw the development of advanced stone tool technologies. As the Bronze Age approached, metallurgy began to surface, though at a slower pace than in other parts of Southeast Asia. The introduction of bronze tools and ornaments marked a significant technological advancement, allowing for improved agricultural practices, craftsmanship, and trade. This metallurgy was primarily based on copper-tin alloys, which were either produced locally or acquired through trade networks.

Agriculture during this period saw intensified rice cultivation, facilitated by improved farming techniques. Communities also practiced slash-and-burn agriculture and domesticated animals such as pigs and chickens, contributing to a more stable food supply and increased sedentism.

Cultural and Artistic Expressions

Artifacts from this era provide insight into the cultural and artistic expressions of the time. Pottery from the Late Neolithic period typically features simple designs, but as the Bronze Age emerged, ceramics became more sophisticated, with intricate decorations and varied forms. Jewelry, made from bronze and sometimes adorned with semi-precious stones, suggests a society placing increasing emphasis on personal adornment and status symbols.

Trade and Interaction

The Late Neolithic to Bronze Age transition in Laos was marked by increased regional interaction. Communities engaged in trade, exchanging commodities such as pottery, metals, and beads. These trade networks connected Laos with surrounding regions, facilitating cultural exchanges that influenced local technological and artistic developments.

Rituals and Beliefs

The archaeological record indicates that spiritual and ritual practices were an integral part of life during this era. Burial sites provide evidence of complex rituals, with graves often containing pottery, tools, and jewelry, suggesting beliefs in an afterlife or spiritual continuity. These practices indicate a society with evolving religious or ritualistic frameworks, potentially involving ancestor worship and animistic traditions.

Challenges and Adaptations

While technological advancements brought about significant advantages, these communities faced challenges such as environmental shifts, resource management, and social stratification. The ability to adapt to these changes was crucial and contributed to the resilience and eventual evolution of these societies into more complex Bronze Age cultures.

In summary, the Late Neolithic to Bronze Age period in Laos represents a critical era of transformation. It is characterized by technological advances, the shift from nomadic to semi-sedentary lifestyles, increased social complexity, and vibrant cultural expressions. These developments laid the foundation for future historical and cultural trajectories in Southeast Asia and underscored the dynamic interplay between environment, technology, and human ingenuity.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
In661 Late Neolithic to Iron Age Indonesia 30 CE Sumatra. Northwest Aceh. Loyang Ujung Cave, Indonesia View
In662 Late Neolithic to Iron Age Indonesia 353 BCE Sumatra. Northwest Aceh. Loyang Ujung Cave, Indonesia View
La364 Late Neolithic to Bronze Age Laos 1125 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Pa Ping, Laos View
La368 The Hoabinhian Culture 6012 BCE Northern Bolikhamsay. Pha Faen, Laos View
La727 Bronze Age Laos 459 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang, Laos View
La898 Unknown Era in Laos 8000 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang, Laos View
Ma554 Historical Malaysia 1448 CE Northeast Borneo. Sabah. Supu Hujung4, Malaysia View
Ma555 Historical Malaysia 1505 CE Northeast Borneo. Sabah. Kinabatagan, Malaysia View
Ma911 Hoabinhian Culture, Malaysia 2463 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Phl534 Red Slipped Pottery Culture, Philippines 84 CE Luzon. Northern Cagayan. Nagsabaran, Philippines View
Th519 Iron Age Thailand 236 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th521 Iron Age Thailand 215 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th530 Iron Age Thailand 238 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th531 Iron Age Thailand 259 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Vt833 Late Neolithic Vietnam 2343 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt880 Late Neolithic Vietnam 2500 BCE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hhon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
JHF05 Modern Malaysia 2000 CE West Peninsular Northern Perak, Malaysia View
JHM06 Modern Malaysia 2000 CE West Peninsular Northern Perak, Malaysia View
IK002 The Jomon Period in Japan 897 BCE Honshu. Central Aichi. Ikawazu, Japan View
Ma912 Late Neolithic Malaysia 744 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Vt779 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 386 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt781 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 389 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt796 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 350 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt808 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 391 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt719 Historical Vietnam 1641 CE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
Vt777 Late Neolithic Vietnam 399 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt778 Late Neolithic Vietnam 800 BCE Northwest Lai Châu. Nam Tun, Vietnam View
Th519 236 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
IK002 897 BCE Honshu. Central Aichi. Ikawazu, Japan View
Ma912 744 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Vt719 1641 CE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
Vt777 399 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt778 800 BCE Northwest Lai Châu. Nam Tun, Vietnam View
Vt779 386 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt781 389 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt796 350 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt808 391 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
La364 Late Neolithic to Bronze Age Laos 1125 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Pa Ping, Laos View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (La364) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Ancient Asians 89%
Ancient Oceanians 4%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 3%
Neolithic Farmers 3%
Ancient Africans 2%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (La364) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Asia 95%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 91%
Chinese 42.1%
Vietnamese 31.9%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 16.7%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 5%
Indian 4.9%
Oceania 3%
Melanesian 3%
Papuan 2.8%
Africa 1%
Congolese & Southern East African 1%
South East African 1.1%
Northern East African 0%
Europe 0%
Northwestern European 0%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample La364 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

La364,0.01586226,-0.3949699,-0.0715237,-0.02975964,0.12295528,0.06515016,-0.00208212,-0.008776,-0.00737684,-0.01293946,0.05814962,0.00421732,-0.0053219,-0.0035845,0.0019708,0.00277572,0.00397944,-0.0024566,-0.00210538,0.00915822,-0.00606162,0.00765032,-0.00353812,0.00011214,0.02394342
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia
Authors:
McColl H, Racimo F, Vinner L
Abstract:

The human occupation history of Southeast Asia (SEA) remains heavily debated. Current evidence suggests that SEA was occupied by Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers until ~4000 years ago, when farming economies developed and expanded, restricting foraging groups to remote habitats. Some argue that agricultural development was indigenous; others favor the "two-layer" hypothesis that posits a southward expansion of farmers giving rise to present-day Southeast Asian genetic diversity. By sequencing 26 ancient human genomes (25 from SEA, 1 Japanese Jōmon), we show that neither interpretation fits the complexity of Southeast Asian history: Both Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers and East Asian farmers contributed to current Southeast Asian diversity, with further migrations affecting island SEA and Vietnam. Our results help resolve one of the long-standing controversies in Southeast Asian prehistory.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025