A man buried in Laos in the Mesolithic era

La898
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
La898
Date:
8000 BCE - 1 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
N9a6
Y-DNA:
O-F2028
Cultural Period:
Unknown Era in Laos
Location
Country:
Laos
Locality:
Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The \Unknown Era" in Laos, though a term not typically used in academic literature, can be imagined as a period prior to the well-documented historical epochs of the region. If we consider this era as one that might predate significant written records and major historical accounts, it would be closely tied to the prehistoric and early historic developments in Southeast Asia, particularly focusing on the cultural, archaeological, and anthropological aspects that shaped early Laotian civilizations.

Geographical Context

Laos is a landlocked country in Southeast Asia, sharing borders with Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, China, and Myanmar. Its varied topography, dominated by mountains, forested hills, and river valleys, particularly the Mekong River, has played a crucial role in the cultural and economic development of the region. The river would have served as a vital source of water, a means of transportation, and a fertile ground for agricultural development, encouraging early settlement patterns.

Archaeological Evidence

The prehistoric era of Laos can be traced back to the presence of human activity during the Paleolithic era, with evidence of stone tools and early human remains suggesting that the region was inhabited by hunter-gatherer communities. Over time, these communities began to transition into more settled agricultural societies with the advent of rice cultivation, which likely played a pivotal role in the social and cultural development of the area.

Early Cultures and Influences

  1. Bronze and Iron Age Cultures: The Bronze Age in Southeast Asia saw the emergence of complex societies marked by advancements in metallurgy, pottery, and agriculture. In Laos, sites like Ban Chiang provide insights into the material culture of the period, reflecting a society skilled in bronze production, which would have facilitated trade and interaction with neighboring regions.

  2. Dong Son Culture: This influential culture, centered in present-day Vietnam, likely extended its influence into Laos. Known for their sophisticated bronze drums, the Dong Son people contributed to the development of regional trade networks and cultural exchanges, introducing new agricultural techniques, religious practices, and artistic styles.

  3. Contact with Indian Civilization: By the first few centuries CE, the spread of Indian civilization brought considerable influence through trade and the dissemination of cultural and religious practices. Buddhism and Hinduism introduced complex religious and philosophical ideas, which began to shape local cultures.

Cultural and Societal Development

The transition from prehistoric to historic periods in Laos involved the transformation from small, tribal communities into more organized political entities. Early forms of statehood likely emerged as a result of increased agricultural surplus, population growth, and the need for defense and resource management.

  • Language and Communication: The linguistic landscape of the Unknown Era would have been diverse, with Austroasiatic and Tai-Kadai language families dominating. Oral traditions and possibly pictographic forms of communication could have been prevalent, serving as the main vehicle for cultural transmission.

  • Religious Practices: Indigenous belief systems, including animism and ancestor worship, would have characterized early religious life. The introduction of Indian religions later on added layers of complexity, contributing to the region’s rich spiritual tapestry.

  • Art and Architecture: Early Laotian societies likely expressed their cultural identity through art forms such as pottery, weaving, and metallurgy. The influence of neighboring cultures and the eventual introduction of Theravada Buddhism would have been reflected in evolving artistic motifs and emerging architectural structures, such as stupas and temples.

Conclusion

While the "Unknown Era" of Laos is characterized by limited direct historical evidence, the amalgamation of archaeological findings, linguistic studies, and regional influences provides a framework to understand the early cultural landscape of Laos. This era laid the foundational elements for the eventual rise of organized states such as Lan Xang and contributed to the rich tapestry of Laotian heritage, which continues to be celebrated today."

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
In661 Late Neolithic to Iron Age Indonesia 30 CE Sumatra. Northwest Aceh. Loyang Ujung Cave, Indonesia View
In662 Late Neolithic to Iron Age Indonesia 353 BCE Sumatra. Northwest Aceh. Loyang Ujung Cave, Indonesia View
La364 Late Neolithic to Bronze Age Laos 1125 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Pa Ping, Laos View
La368 The Hoabinhian Culture 6012 BCE Northern Bolikhamsay. Pha Faen, Laos View
La727 Bronze Age Laos 459 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang, Laos View
La898 Unknown Era in Laos 8000 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang, Laos View
Ma554 Historical Malaysia 1448 CE Northeast Borneo. Sabah. Supu Hujung4, Malaysia View
Ma555 Historical Malaysia 1505 CE Northeast Borneo. Sabah. Kinabatagan, Malaysia View
Ma911 Hoabinhian Culture, Malaysia 2463 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Phl534 Red Slipped Pottery Culture, Philippines 84 CE Luzon. Northern Cagayan. Nagsabaran, Philippines View
Th519 Iron Age Thailand 236 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th521 Iron Age Thailand 215 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th530 Iron Age Thailand 238 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th531 Iron Age Thailand 259 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Vt833 Late Neolithic Vietnam 2343 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt880 Late Neolithic Vietnam 2500 BCE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hhon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
JHF05 Modern Malaysia 2000 CE West Peninsular Northern Perak, Malaysia View
JHM06 Modern Malaysia 2000 CE West Peninsular Northern Perak, Malaysia View
IK002 The Jomon Period in Japan 897 BCE Honshu. Central Aichi. Ikawazu, Japan View
Ma912 Late Neolithic Malaysia 744 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Vt779 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 386 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt781 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 389 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt796 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 350 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt808 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 391 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt719 Historical Vietnam 1641 CE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
Vt777 Late Neolithic Vietnam 399 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt778 Late Neolithic Vietnam 800 BCE Northwest Lai Châu. Nam Tun, Vietnam View
Th519 236 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
IK002 897 BCE Honshu. Central Aichi. Ikawazu, Japan View
Ma912 744 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Vt719 1641 CE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
Vt777 399 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt778 800 BCE Northwest Lai Châu. Nam Tun, Vietnam View
Vt779 386 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt781 389 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt796 350 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt808 391 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
La898 Unknown Era in Laos 8000 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang, Laos View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (La898) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Ancient Asians 78%
Ancient Oceanians 7%
Neolithic Farmers 5%
Ancient Native Americans 4%
European Hunter-Gatherers 4%
Ancient Africans 2%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (La898) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Asia 91%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 89%
Vietnamese 40.2%
Chinese 27.1%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 21.7%
Northern West Asian 2%
Mesopotamian 2.2%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 0%
Europe 4%
Northwestern European 4%
Northwestern European 3.1%
English 0.7%
Africa 3%
Congolese & Southern East African 2%
South East African 1.8%
North African 1%
North African 1.0%
West African 0%
Oceania 2%
Melanesian 2%
Papuan 1.7%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample La898 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

La898,0.0150658,-0.38609224,-0.0730579,-0.02937508,0.12718932,0.06011756,-0.00354862,-0.0092416,-0.00853118,-0.0146519,0.06579824,0.00517652,-0.00675482,-0.000166,0.00513156,0.00123714,-0.0028363,-0.00089224,-0.00118698,0.00798084,-0.00757218,0.00051514,-0.00889114,-0.00208154,0.01597332
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia
Authors:
McColl H, Racimo F, Vinner L
Abstract:

The human occupation history of Southeast Asia (SEA) remains heavily debated. Current evidence suggests that SEA was occupied by Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers until ~4000 years ago, when farming economies developed and expanded, restricting foraging groups to remote habitats. Some argue that agricultural development was indigenous; others favor the "two-layer" hypothesis that posits a southward expansion of farmers giving rise to present-day Southeast Asian genetic diversity. By sequencing 26 ancient human genomes (25 from SEA, 1 Japanese Jōmon), we show that neither interpretation fits the complexity of Southeast Asian history: Both Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers and East Asian farmers contributed to current Southeast Asian diversity, with further migrations affecting island SEA and Vietnam. Our results help resolve one of the long-standing controversies in Southeast Asian prehistory.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025