A man buried in Malaysia in the Mesolithic era

Ma911
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
Ma911
Date:
2463 BCE - 2209 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
M21b1a
Y-DNA:
D-M174
Cultural Period:
Hoabinhian Culture, Malaysia
Location
Country:
Malaysia
Locality:
West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Hoabinhian culture, also known as the Hoabinhian culture, is an important prehistoric cultural and archaeological complex that flourished in Southeast Asia, particularly in regions such as Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, and parts of Sumatra and Borneo. This culture is generally dated from around 10,000 BCE to 2,000 BCE, representing a significant period during the Mesolithic era, known for its distinctive stone tool technology and subsistence strategies.

Overview

The Hoabinhian name is derived from the site of Hoa Binh in northern Vietnam, where some of the earliest findings associated with this culture were discovered. Throughout its long history, the Hoabinhian culture contributed significantly to our understanding of prehistoric Southeast Asian societies, providing insights into their adaptation to local environments, technological innovations, and cultural practices.

Geography and Environment

The Hoabinhian culture primarily developed in the tropical, forested lowland regions of Southeast Asia. These areas provided a rich variety of ecological niches and resources, such as streams, rivers, coastal areas, and dense forests. These environments supported a broad-spectrum foraging economy, emphasizing a diverse diet including hunting, gathering, fishing, and possibly early forms of plant management.

Subsistence and Economy

Hoabinhian communities were highly adapted to the forested environments they inhabited. Their subsistence strategies were flexible and opportunistic, focusing on a wide variety of available resources. Evidence suggests that the Hoabinhian people engaged in:

  • Hunting and Gathering: They hunted small to medium-sized game such as monkeys, deer, and wild boar, and gathered a variety of plant foods, nuts, and fruits.
  • Fishing and Shellfish Gathering: Proximity to water bodies meant that fish and shellfish were essential components of their diet, as evidenced by shell middens found at various archaeological sites.
  • Early Plant Cultivation: Some researchers suggest that the Hoabinhian people may have practiced early forms of plant management or cultivation, as indicated by the presence of plant remains and cultivation tools at some sites.

Technology and Material Culture

The Hoabinhian culture is best known for its distinctive tool-making tradition, characterized by:

  • Stone Tools: These tools are mainly unifacially flaked pebble tools, such as axes and adzes, which exhibit a unique form of craftsmanship called the \Hoabinhian technique." This technique involves heavy chipping of stones on one side, producing tools that were efficient for woodworking and other tasks.

  • Use of Organic Materials: Although less preserved, tools made of bones, antler, and bamboo were likely crucial components of their technology, given the resource-rich environments they occupied.

Settlement Patterns and Social Organization

The Hoabinhian communities were likely semi-nomadic, occupying temporary campsites and caves, as evidenced by archaeological finds in coastal and inland regions of Malaysia. These sites suggest small, mobile groups that moved according to seasonal availability of resources. It is hypothesized that their social organization was relatively egalitarian, with social structures centered around kinship and cooperative survival strategies.

Cultural and Artistic Expressions

While direct evidence of complex symbolic or artistic expression is limited, the Hoabinhian culture may have had rich oral traditions and material culture that have not survived archaeologically. Some sites have uncovered ochre, suggesting possible body decoration, which hints at aesthetic and symbolic practices.

Impact and Legacy

The Hoabinhian culture represents a critical stage in the prehistory of Southeast Asia, showcasing early adaptation to tropical environments and setting the stage for later cultural developments. Understanding this culture helps researchers trace the transitions from hunter-gatherer lifestyles to more complex societies and the eventual arrival of the Austronesian-speaking peoples who further transformed the region's cultural landscape.

The following centuries saw significant cultural and technological advancements that built upon the foundation laid by the Hoabinhian communities, marking an essential chapter in the broader narrative of human history in Southeast Asia."

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
In661 Late Neolithic to Iron Age Indonesia 30 CE Sumatra. Northwest Aceh. Loyang Ujung Cave, Indonesia View
In662 Late Neolithic to Iron Age Indonesia 353 BCE Sumatra. Northwest Aceh. Loyang Ujung Cave, Indonesia View
La364 Late Neolithic to Bronze Age Laos 1125 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Pa Ping, Laos View
La368 The Hoabinhian Culture 6012 BCE Northern Bolikhamsay. Pha Faen, Laos View
La727 Bronze Age Laos 459 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang, Laos View
La898 Unknown Era in Laos 8000 BCE Northeast Huapan. Tam Hang, Laos View
Ma554 Historical Malaysia 1448 CE Northeast Borneo. Sabah. Supu Hujung4, Malaysia View
Ma555 Historical Malaysia 1505 CE Northeast Borneo. Sabah. Kinabatagan, Malaysia View
Ma911 Hoabinhian Culture, Malaysia 2463 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Phl534 Red Slipped Pottery Culture, Philippines 84 CE Luzon. Northern Cagayan. Nagsabaran, Philippines View
Th519 Iron Age Thailand 236 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th521 Iron Age Thailand 215 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th530 Iron Age Thailand 238 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Th531 Iron Age Thailand 259 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
Vt833 Late Neolithic Vietnam 2343 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt880 Late Neolithic Vietnam 2500 BCE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hhon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
JHF05 Modern Malaysia 2000 CE West Peninsular Northern Perak, Malaysia View
JHM06 Modern Malaysia 2000 CE West Peninsular Northern Perak, Malaysia View
IK002 The Jomon Period in Japan 897 BCE Honshu. Central Aichi. Ikawazu, Japan View
Ma912 Late Neolithic Malaysia 744 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Vt779 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 386 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt781 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 389 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt796 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 350 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt808 Bronze Age Dong Son Culture, Vietnam 391 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt719 Historical Vietnam 1641 CE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
Vt777 Late Neolithic Vietnam 399 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt778 Late Neolithic Vietnam 800 BCE Northwest Lai Châu. Nam Tun, Vietnam View
Th519 236 CE Northern Mae Hong Son. Long Long Rak, Thailand View
IK002 897 BCE Honshu. Central Aichi. Ikawazu, Japan View
Ma912 744 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Vt719 1641 CE Northeast Quang Ninh. Hon Hai Co Tien, Vietnam View
Vt777 399 BCE Northern Thanh Hoa. Mai Da Dieu, Vietnam View
Vt778 800 BCE Northwest Lai Châu. Nam Tun, Vietnam View
Vt779 386 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt781 389 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt796 350 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Vt808 391 BCE Northern Thanh Noa. Nui Nap, Vietnam View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
Ma911 Hoabinhian Culture, Malaysia 2463 BCE West Peninsular Kelantan. Gua Cha Cave, Malaysia View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (Ma911) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Ancient Asians 58%
Ancient Oceanians 17%
Neolithic Farmers 13%
Ancient Africans 10%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 2%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (Ma911) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Asia 77%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 49%
Indian 49.0%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 21%
Tibetan 11.3%
Chinese 4.9%
Vietnamese 4.2%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 0.8%
Japanese & Korean 7%
Japanese 6.8%
Oceania 15%
Melanesian 15%
Papuan 14.6%
Africa 8%
Northern East African 7%
Eastern African 7.3%
West African 1%
Senegambian & Guinean 0.6%
Congolese & Southern East African 0%
Europe 0%
Southern European 0%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample Ma911 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

Ma911,-0.01783106,-0.18232688,-0.12079708,0.07634944,0.0360541,-0.02817122,-0.00768822,0.00458078,0.01476338,0.01853896,0.0075915,0.00189396,-0.00288166,0.00193066,-0.00258546,-0.00540148,0.00092938,0.00061214,0.00156562,-0.00119406,-0.00084998,-0.00065456,-0.0054224,-0.00066144,-0.00201022
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia
Authors:
McColl H, Racimo F, Vinner L
Abstract:

The human occupation history of Southeast Asia (SEA) remains heavily debated. Current evidence suggests that SEA was occupied by Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers until ~4000 years ago, when farming economies developed and expanded, restricting foraging groups to remote habitats. Some argue that agricultural development was indigenous; others favor the "two-layer" hypothesis that posits a southward expansion of farmers giving rise to present-day Southeast Asian genetic diversity. By sequencing 26 ancient human genomes (25 from SEA, 1 Japanese Jōmon), we show that neither interpretation fits the complexity of Southeast Asian history: Both Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers and East Asian farmers contributed to current Southeast Asian diversity, with further migrations affecting island SEA and Vietnam. Our results help resolve one of the long-standing controversies in Southeast Asian prehistory.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025