A woman buried in Russia in the Copper Age era

The Maikop culture, an archaeological culture of the Early Bronze Age, flourished in the North Caucasus region around 3700 to 3000 BCE. It is named after the town of Maikop in Adygea, southern Russia, where the first significant artifacts and burial mounds (kurgans) associated with this culture were uncovered in the late 19th century. This culture is of particular interest because it lies at the intersection of several significant prehistoric developments and might hold clues to the spread of Proto-Indo-European languages and cultures.
Geographic and Temporal Context
The Maikop culture occupied the steppes and the foothills of the Caucasus Mountains, including parts of what is now southern Russia, and extending possibly into the western Caucasus and northeastern regions of the Armenian Highlands. Its timeline overlaps with other significant cultures such as the Kura-Araxes culture to the south and the Yamna culture to the north. This spatial and temporal framework has led scholars to speculate on the interactions and influences between these cultures and the role Maikop played as a bridge for the movement of ideas, technologies, and possibly languages.
Burial Practices and Material Culture
One of the best-documented aspects of the Maikop culture is its burial practices. The use of kurgans, or burial mounds, is a prominent feature, with the principal burial often accompanied by numerous grave goods, including pottery, metal objects, and ornaments. The Maikop kurgans are noted for their rich assemblages, suggesting a stratified society with prominent individuals, possibly chieftains or leaders, possessing considerable resources.
Artifacts from Maikop graves include intricately crafted gold and silver items, copper tools, and weapons, which indicate a high level of metallurgical skill. The presence of items made from precious metals suggests contacts with or influences from regions to the south, such as Mesopotamia and Anatolia, where metallurgy was more advanced during this period.
Economy and Subsistence
The economy of the Maikop culture was primarily based on agriculture and animal husbandry, supplemented by hunting and gathering. Evidence suggests that they cultivated cereal crops and domesticated animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats. The fertile plains and river valleys of the region supported these activities, and the readily available natural resources would have facilitated trade with neighboring cultures.
The presence of exotic artifacts, such as items made from materials not locally available, implies an extensive trade network. This trade network could have reached as far as the Near East, facilitating the exchange of not only goods but also ideas and technologies.
Settlement Patterns and Architecture
Little is known about the settlement patterns of the Maikop culture, as the primary focus of excavation and research has been on their burial sites. However, it is likely that they inhabited both permanent settlements in the fertile river valleys and seasonal or semi-nomadic camps on the steppes. The architecture at known sites suggests structures made from readily available materials such as wood and mud-brick.
Cultural and Linguistic Considerations
The Maikop culture may have played a crucial role in the hypothesized diffusion of Proto-Indo-European languages. While concrete evidence linking them directly to Proto-Indo-Europeans remains elusive, their strategic location as a cultural crossroads within the Caucasus region supports theories of linguistic and cultural exchange. The interaction between the Maikop, Kura-Araxes, and Yamna cultures presents a complex picture of cultural synthesis and dispersion that likely influenced the developing linguistic landscape of Eurasia.
Conclusion
The Maikop culture represents a pivotal point in Eurasian prehistory. Its monuments, artifacts, and possible connections to larger trade networks and emerging Indo-European societies underscore its historical significance. Continued archaeological research is vital to unravel the mysteries of the Maikop people and their potential impact on the spread of early Indo-European languages and cultures.
Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (MK5005) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.
Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (MK5005) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.
These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.
The G25 coordinates for the sample MK5005 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.
MK5005,0.10185996,0.03115618,0.00413866,0.04139686,-0.03993294,0.0155703,-0.0057775,-0.01462748,-0.03021208,-0.03116382,0.00218006,-0.00072984,0.0006425,-0.00869018,-0.00058176,-0.00556604,-0.0023489,-0.00401336,-0.00767032,-0.00170834,-0.00311924,0.00194004,-0.00687278,0.00224674,-0.00666617
Ancient human genome-wide data from a 3000-year interval in the Caucasus corresponds with eco-geographic regions
Archaeogenetic studies have described the formation of Eurasian 'steppe ancestry' as a mixture of Eastern and Caucasus hunter-gatherers. However, it remains unclear when and where this ancestry arose and whether it was related to a horizon of cultural innovations in the 4th millennium BCE that subsequently facilitated the advance of pastoral societies in Eurasia. Here we generated genome-wide SNP data from 45 prehistoric individuals along a 3000-year temporal transect in the North Caucasus. We observe a genetic separation between the groups of the Caucasus and those of the adjacent steppe. The northern Caucasus groups are genetically similar to contemporaneous populations south of it, suggesting human movement across the mountain range during the Bronze Age. The steppe groups from Yamnaya and subsequent pastoralist cultures show evidence for previously undetected farmer-related ancestry from different contact zones, while Steppe Maykop individuals harbour additional Upper Palaeolithic Siberian and Native American related ancestry.