A man buried in Vietnam in the Neolithic era

The Neolithic era in Vietnam, particularly the period associated with Austroasiatic-speaking peoples, is a fascinating chapter in the region's prehistory. This era, which spans approximately from 10,000 BCE to 2,000 BCE, marks significant developments in technology, social organization, and culture as human societies transitioned from nomadic lifestyles to more settled agricultural communities.

1. Geographical Setting: Neolithic Vietnam was part of a broader Southeast Asian context, characterized by diverse ecosystems including river deltas, coastal plains, and mountainous regions. The Red River Delta and the Mekong River Delta were particularly crucial, providing fertile lands that supported early agricultural settlements.

2. Origins and Influences: The people of Neolithic Vietnam were likely influenced by migrations and interactions with surrounding regions, particularly from southern China and Southeast Asia. The Austroasiatic language family, which includes Vietnamese and Khmer, is believed to have spread southward during this time, suggesting a movement of people and ideas.

3. Subsistence and Economy: This era saw a gradual shift from hunting and gathering to agriculture, with rice cultivation becoming increasingly important. The domestication of plants and animals allowed for more stable food sources and supported population growth. Fishing and shellfish collection were also crucial, with evidence of extensive coastal and riverine exploitation.

4. Tools and Technology: The Neolithic period is characterized by the development of polished stone tools, which were more efficient and durable than their predecessors. These tools were used for farming, hunting, and crafting. Pottery also emerged, with distinctive styles that varied geographically and temporally, providing insights into cultural practices and exchanges.

5. Social Organization and Settlements: As communities became more sedentary, social organization grew more complex. Early villages were established, often strategically located near water sources. Archaeological evidence suggests these settlements included communal spaces and storage facilities, indicating a level of social coordination and planning.

6. Cultural Practices and Beliefs: The Austroasiatic-speaking peoples of Neolithic Vietnam likely had rich spiritual beliefs and practices, evidenced by burial sites and artifacts. These include elaborate grave goods, such as pottery and tools, which suggest a belief in an afterlife. Rituals may have been closely tied to agricultural cycles, reflecting the community's dependence on farming.

7. Art and Expression: Though direct evidence is sparse, the presence of decorated pottery and carved objects implies a developing aesthetic sense and symbolic communication. These artistic expressions likely had cultural significance, possibly related to identity and social status.

8. Trade and Interaction: There was likely regional trade and interaction, both within Vietnam and with neighboring areas. Exchange of goods such as pottery, stone tools, and possibly even agricultural products would have facilitated cultural diffusion and innovation.

9. Archaeological Evidence: Key archaeological sites, such as those in the Red River Delta, provide valuable insights into the Neolithic culture of Vietnam. Excavations have uncovered tools, pottery, and settlement patterns that illustrate the transition to more complex societies during this period. Sites like Phung Nguyen, with its advanced pottery and tools, highlight the sophistication of Neolithic cultures in Vietnam.

In conclusion, Neolithic Vietnam, particularly among Austroasiatic-speaking peoples, was a period of significant transformation and development. The advancements in agriculture, technology, and social structure set the foundation for future cultural and historical developments in the region, leading to the rise of complex societies and eventual state formation. The legacy of this era is still evident in Vietnam's cultural and linguistic heritage today.

• Same Publication
• Same Culture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I2731) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I2731) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

The G25 coordinates for the sample I2731 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

Ancient genomes document multiple waves of migration in Southeast Asian prehistory