A man buried in Iran in the Neolithic era

The Neolithic era, particularly in regions like the Zagros Mountains of Iran, marks a significant period in human prehistory known for the transition from nomadic hunter-gatherer communities to settled agricultural societies. Wezmeh Cave, located in this mountainous region, provides significant insights into this transformative period during the Zagros Neolithic era.

Geographic and Environmental Context

Wezmeh Cave is situated in the rugged Zagros Mountains, a prominent range in western Iran. This region is characterized by its diverse topography, including high peaks, deep valleys, and fertile plains. The climate during the early Neolithic period would have been relatively mild compared to today, supporting a variety of flora and fauna that were crucial to the subsistence strategies of early human inhabitants.

Archaeological Significance

Wezmeh Cave is an important archaeological site that has yielded numerous artifacts and remains from the Neolithic era. The findings from the cave contribute to understanding the broader Zagros Neolithic culture, highlighting the ways in which early humans adapted to their environment and transitioned toward sedentism.

Cultural and Societal Developments

1. Subsistence Strategies:

   • Domestication of Plants and Animals: Evidence from Wezmeh Cave suggests early forms of agriculture. Cereals like wheat and barley, alongside legumes, were among the first domesticated plants. The domestication of animals, including goats and sheep, marked a crucial development in food production.
   • Hunting and Gathering: Despite the advancing agricultural practices, hunting of wild animals and gathering of plant resources continued to play a significant role. This dual strategy allowed for a more reliable food source as communities adjusted to new modes of subsistence.

2. Tools and Technology:

   • The inhabitants of the Wezmeh Cave used a variety of lithic tools. These tools were essential for both agricultural activities and hunting.
   • Pottery shards found in the cave indicate the early development of ceramic technology, which was important for food storage and cooking.

3. Societal Structures:

   • Settlements: While the cave itself would have primarily served as a seasonal shelter or for specific activities, evidence points towards more permanent settlements developing in the surrounding areas.
   • Social Organization: The gradual rise in sedentism likely led to changes in societal organization, with indications of more complex social structures emerging, including division of labor and possibly the beginnings of social hierarchies.

4. Symbolic and Ritual Practices:

   • Findings such as figurines and burial artifacts suggest that the Zagros Neolithic communities, including those at Wezmeh Cave, engaged in ritualistic and symbolic practices. These artifacts provide insights into the spiritual and cultural lives of the inhabitants.

Interactions and Influence

The Zagros Neolithic culture, as evidenced by sites like Wezmeh Cave, was not isolated. It played a part in a broader network of interactions across the Neolithic world. There is evidence of trade and cultural exchange, which facilitated the dissemination of technological innovations and agricultural practices.

Conclusion

The study of Wezmeh Cave offers valuable insights into the Neolithic period in the Zagros region. It highlights significant cultural and technological transformations that defined early human societies' shift towards agriculture and sedentism. The archaeological record from the cave underscores the complexity and adaptability of human populations in ancient Iran, illustrating a pivotal era that laid the foundations for future civilizations in the region.

• Same Publication
• Same Culture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (WC1) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (WC1) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

The G25 coordinates for the sample WC1 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

Early Neolithic genomes from the eastern Fertile Crescent