A woman buried in Germany in the Early Bronze Age era

The Early Bronze Age Únětice culture, which flourished in what is now modern-day Germany (as well as in parts of the Czech Republic, Poland, and Austria) from approximately 2300 to 1600 BCE, represents a significant period within the broader context of the European Bronze Age. This culture is named after the village of Únětice, near Prague, where key archaeological discoveries were made.
Geographical Spread and Influence
The Únětice culture covered a substantial area of Central Europe, predominantly within the regions of Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Austria. In Germany, it particularly influenced areas such as Saxony, Thuringia, and Bavaria. Its spread across these regions suggests a well-connected network of trade and cultural exchange.
Social Structure and Organization
Únětice society is believed to have been relatively hierarchical, indicated by the varying wealth and goods found in burial sites. The emergence of social stratification is evident from the prominent burial mounds, or tumuli, that framed the landscape. Some individuals, presumably of higher status, were interred with valuable grave goods, which included metalwork and exotic items.
Metallurgy and Technological Advances
One of the defining features of the Únětice culture was its advancements in metallurgy. This period marked a transition from the use of native copper to the alloying of bronze, a harder and more versatile material. The culture is known for producing various metal objects, such as weapons (including daggers and axes), tools, and personal ornaments (such as pins and bracelets).
Únětice metalwork often features intricate designs and demonstrates high levels of craftsmanship. The development and widespread use of bronze played a crucial role in the culture's economic and social systems, facilitating trade and elevating the status of craft specialists within society.
Burial Practices
Burial customs provide significant insights into the Únětice culture. The typical burial was inhumation, with bodies often placed in a flexed position. Notably, burial sites frequently included grave goods, which ranged from pottery and jewelry to weapons. The richness and variety of these goods have led archaeologists to deduce the presence of a class-based society.
Some prominent burial sites, like those found at Leubingen and Helmsdorf in Germany, contain extensive remains and rich grave goods, indicating the importance of certain individuals and possibly their status as leaders or elites within the society.
Economy and Trade
The Únětice culture was part of a broader network of trade routes that extended across Europe. The distribution of Únětice artifacts, especially metalwork, suggests commercial exchanges not only within its geographical boundaries but also with distant regions. The exchange network likely included raw materials such as tin and copper, critical for bronze production.
Agriculture was also a vital component of the Únětice economy, with evidence of crop cultivation and animal husbandry. Settlements were typically situated in fertile areas conducive to farming, reflecting a semi-sedentary way of life.
Art and Symbolism
While the Únětice culture did not leave behind a wealth of artistic expressions in the form of visual art, the design and symbolism in metalwork and pottery suggest a complex cultural identity. Patterns and motifs found on various objects may hold symbolic meanings or denote cultural affiliations.
Decline and Legacy
By around 1600 BCE, the Únětice culture began to decline, paving the way for other regional cultures. However, its influence persisted, laying the foundations for subsequent cultures in Central Europe. Its advancements in metallurgy and establishment of trade networks were particularly consequential for the development of later European societies.
In summary, the Early Bronze Age Únětice culture in Germany represents a period of significant social, technological, and economic transformation. Its contributions to metallurgy, complex social structures, and expansive trade networks highlight its role as a pivotal cultural force in the European Bronze Age narrative.
Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (LEU018) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.
Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (LEU018) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.
These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.
The G25 coordinates for the sample LEU018 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.
LEU018,0.13156626,0.11566936,0.0523934,0.05491592,0.02873254,0.02393602,0.00490442,0.0064834,-0.0004859,-0.01147168,-0.00592516,0.00381778,0.00332018,-0.00342262,0.00824138,0.00129156,-0.0086038,0.00070366,-0.00056958,-0.00110556,0.0030228,0.00258124,0.00251432,0.00545514,-0.00179556
Kinship practices at the early bronze age site of Leubingen in Central Germany
With the beginning of the Early Bronze Age in Central Europe ~ 2200 BC, a regional and supra-regional hierarchical social organization emerged with few individuals in positions of power (chiefs), set apart by rich graves with extensive burial constructions. However, the social organization and stratification within the majority of people, who represent the non-elite, remain unclear. Here, we present genome-wide data of 46 individuals from the Early Bronze Age burial ground of Leubingen in today's Germany, integrating archaeological, genetic and strontium isotope data to gain new insights into Early Bronze Age societies. We were able to reconstruct five pedigrees which constitute the members of close biological kinship groups (parents and their offspring), and also identify individuals who are not related to individuals buried at the site. Based on combined lines of evidence, we observe that the kinship structure of the burial community was predominantly patrilineal/virilocal involving female exogamy. Further, we detect a difference in the amount of grave goods among the individuals buried at Leubingen based on genetic sex, age at death and locality but see no difference in the types of grave goods.