A man buried in Austria in the Hunter-Gatherer era

The Neolithic era in what is now Austria marks a transformative period in human history, characterized by the transition from nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyles to more settled agricultural communities. This era is part of a broader wave of Neolithic expansion across Europe, which introduced new technological, social, and cultural practices.
Neolithic Hunter-Gatherers
Prior to the advent of the Linear Pottery Culture (LBK), the regions of Austria were inhabited by Mesolithic hunter-gatherer communities. These groups were highly mobile, relying on the richness of the regional flora and fauna. Their subsistence strategies would have included hunting wild game such as red deer and wild boar, fishing in the numerous rivers and lakes, and gathering wild plants and fruits.
The archaeological record from this period, though sparse, provides insight into their lifestyle. Stone tools such as microliths indicate a sophisticated understanding of tool-making, essential for hunting and food preparation. The existence of temporary campsites and evidence of controlled use of fire are also characteristics of these groups.
Introduction of the Linear Pottery Culture (LBK)
Around 5500 BCE, the Linear Pottery Culture, one of the first farming communities in central Europe, began to spread into the region. This culture is named after its distinct pottery decorated with linear incised patterns. The LBK represents a significant cultural shift, introducing agriculture as a dominant way of life. This period was marked by the establishment of permanent settlements, which supported a growing population.
Settlements and Architecture
LBK communities typically comprised small to medium-sized homesteads scattered across the landscape. Dwellings were often longhouses, constructed using timber post frameworks with wattle and daub walls and thatched roofs. These structures could house extended families and possibly even livestock during harsh weather conditions.
Settlements were commonly located near rivers or fertile plains, optimizing access to fresh water and arable land. This strategic placement facilitated the successful cultivation of cereals like wheat and barley and the domestication of animals such as cattle, pigs, and sheep.
Economy and Subsistence
The economy of the LBK culture was largely based on agriculture, supplemented by hunting, gathering, and fishing. The development of polished stone tools, such as axes and adzes, played a crucial role in clearing forests for farming. The introduction of the ard (a simple plow) is also attributed to this period, improving the efficiency of cultivating land.
In addition to plant cultivation, animal husbandry provided meat, milk, and secondary products like leather and wool. The combination of these subsistence strategies resulted in a more stable and predictable food supply than that of their Mesolithic predecessors.
Social Structure and Cultural Practices
The social structure of LBK communities is inferred from burial practices and settlement organization. Cemeteries suggest some form of social stratification, as evidenced by the varying richness of grave goods. Items found in burials often include pottery, stone tools, and ornaments made from bone, shell, or exotic materials.
Pottery played a central role in LBK culture, not only as utilitarian objects but also as cultural artifacts. The decorative styles of their ceramics can vary significantly, indicating regional diversity and potential interactions between different groups.
Technological and Cultural Exchange
The Neolithic era in Austria under the LBK also indicates significant interaction and exchange with neighboring communities. The spread of agriculture, pottery styles, and technology suggests a network of communication and trade routes across Europe. This exchange would have facilitated the spread of innovations and contributed to cultural diversification within the region.
Conclusion
The Neolithic Hunter-Gatherers and Linear Pottery Culture in Austria represent a pivotal time of change and adaptation. This period laid the foundations for the complex agricultural societies that would follow, marking the beginning of the end for the nomadic lifestyles of the earlier Mesolithic populations. The advancements in agriculture, technology, and social organization during this era had lasting impacts, influencing the development of subsequent European cultures and civilizations.
Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I6913) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.
Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I6913) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.
These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.
The G25 coordinates for the sample I6913 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.
I6913,0.1234885,0.13630858,0.05642176,0.03090936,0.0436405,0.01066626,0.00085786,-0.00206424,0.01034538,0.01056348,-0.00865972,0.010164,-0.01688456,-0.01142964,0.01857478,-0.01059054,-0.01656814,-0.00031332,0.00095234,-0.00252472,0.00681168,0.0010383,-0.00887086,0.00773394,-0.00384647
Interactions between earliest Linearbandkeramik farmers and central European hunter gatherers at the dawn of European Neolithization
Archaeogenetic research over the last decade has demonstrated that European Neolithic farmers (ENFs) were descended primarily from Anatolian Neolithic farmers (ANFs). ENFs, including early Neolithic central European Linearbandkeramik (LBK) farming communities, also harbored ancestry from European Mesolithic hunter gatherers (WHGs) to varying extents, reflecting admixture between ENFs and WHGs. However, the timing and other details of this process are still imperfectly understood. In this report, we provide a bioarchaeological analysis of three individuals interred at the Brunn 2 site of the Brunn am Gebirge-Wolfholz archeological complex, one of the oldest LBK sites in central Europe. Two of the individuals had a mixture of WHG-related and ANF-related ancestry, one of them with approximately 50% of each, while the third individual had approximately all ANF-related ancestry. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios for all three individuals were within the range of variation reflecting diets of other Neolithic agrarian populations. Strontium isotope analysis revealed that the ~50% WHG-ANF individual was non-local to the Brunn 2 area. Overall, our data indicate interbreeding between incoming farmers, whose ancestors ultimately came from western Anatolia, and local HGs, starting within the first few generations of the arrival of the former in central Europe, as well as highlighting the integrative nature and composition of the early LBK communities.