A man buried in Latvia in the Mesolithic era

I4626
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
I4626
Date:
5838 BCE - 5631 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
U2e1
Y-DNA:
R1b1b
Cultural Period:
Hunter-Gatherer Latvia
Location
Country:
Latvia
Locality:
Zvejnieki
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The era of Hunter-Gatherer Latvia is a fascinating period marked by the subsistence practices and cultural developments of European Hunter-Gatherers, who inhabited the Baltic region during the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods. This time frame spans approximately from 9000 BCE to 3000 BCE, covering a period of significant change in environmental conditions, technological advancements, and social organization.

Geography and Environment:

Hunter-Gatherer Latvia existed within a geographic context characterized by rich natural resources. Located on the eastern coast of the Baltic Sea, present-day Latvia features a varied landscape that includes dense forests, numerous lakes, rivers, and a long coastline. In the early Mesolithic period, after the last Ice Age, the region was increasingly covered by boreal forests, with a gradual development into mixed woodlands. This environment provided an abundance of game, including elk, deer, wild boar, and smaller mammals, as well as fish, fowl, and edible plants, which were critical to the subsistence economy of the time.

Subsistence and Economy:

The hunter-gatherers of Latvia exploited the rich natural resources around them. Their subsistence strategy was diverse and highly adaptive, relying primarily on hunting, fishing, and foraging. Seasonal movements were likely orchestrated around the availability of food, with communities following the migration patterns of game and the seasonal abundance of fish in rivers and coastal areas. Salmon, in particular, were a crucial resource in rivers, particularly during their spawning runs.

In addition to hunting and fishing, foraging for nuts, berries, and tubers was a significant aspect of their subsistence strategy. The forests provided hazelnuts, acorns, and a variety of berries, which were gathered and possibly stored to ensure food availability throughout different seasons.

Tools and Technology:

The technological repertoire of these hunter-gatherers was largely based on the local materials available, predominantly flint, bone, and antler. Flint knapping produced a variety of tools including blades, scrapers, and arrowheads, which were essential for hunting and processing animal hides. Bone and antler were utilized to craft tools like harpoons, fish hooks, and awls, showcasing a refined understanding of materials and their properties.

Ceramics began to appear late in the hunter-gatherer period, marking a significant technological advancement. These early pottery items were rudimentary but signify the beginning of changes in storage and food preparation practices.

Social Structure and Settlement Patterns:

The social structure of these communities was likely relatively egalitarian, typical of mobile hunter-gatherer groups. Social organization revolved around kinship and shared responsibilities related to food acquisition and distribution. The small, mobile bands were composed of extended family units and had a high degree of social flexibility.

Settlements were highly influenced by the environment, with sites often located near rivers, lakes, and coasts to take advantage of water resources and the associated biodiversity. Seasonal camps and occasionally more permanent settlements were established, evidenced by archaeological findings of dwellings, hearths, and storage pits.

Spiritual and Cultural Aspects:

The spiritual life of Hunter-Gatherer Latvia remains largely speculative, but it likely involved animistic beliefs, with the natural world being imbued with spiritual significance. Artifacts such as carved bone and decorated tools, along with burial sites, suggest the presence of symbolic thought and ritual practices.

Burial practices potentially included grave goods, which might signify beliefs in an afterlife or spiritual continuity. The care taken in burials indicates a deep respect for the deceased and hints at complex social and cultural identities.

Transition and Interaction:

Throughout this era, the transition to more permanent settlements and the beginning of agriculture signaled significant changes. Contact and trade with neighboring cultures, particularly as Neolithic farmers began moving into the region, introduced new technologies, crops, and domesticated animals. This interaction eventually led to the gradual transformation of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle, setting the stage for the Bronze Age cultures that followed.

In summary, Hunter-Gatherer Latvia represents a dynamic period in prehistory characterized by the adaptability of human societies to changing environments and the rich tapestry of cultural developments in one of Europe's northern landscapes. These communities laid important foundations for the region's later prehistoric developments and cultural heritage.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I1378 Neolithic Ukraine 5400 BCE Vovnigi, Ukraine View
I4626 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5838 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4631 Middle Neolithic Comb Ware Culture, Latvia 4236 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I1819 9107 BCE Vasil'evka, Ukraine View
I1378 5400 BCE Vovnigi, Ukraine View
I4626 5838 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4627 4311 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4628 5304 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4629 3091 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4631 4236 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4632 6465 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I1819 9107 BCE Vasil'evka, Ukraine View
I4632 6465 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4628 5304 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4629 3091 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4627 4311 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
Ukraine_HG1 Mesolithic Ukraine 9107 BCE Vasylivka-3 (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
Ukraine_N1 Neolithic Ukraine 5400 BCE Vovnihy-2 (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Dnipro District, Solone municipality), Ukraine View
Latvia_MN1 Middle Neolithic Latvia 4311 BCE Zvejnieki (Zemgale, Neretas District), Latvia View
Latvia_HG3 Latvian Mesolithic Culture 5304 BCE Zvejnieki (Zemgale, Neretas District), Latvia View
Latvia_MN2 Middle Neolithic Comb Ware Culture, Latvia 4236 BCE Zvejnieki (Zemgale, Neretas District), Latvia View
Latvia_HG1 Latvian Mesolithic Culture 6465 BCE Zvejnieki (Zemgale, Neretas District), Latvia View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I4432 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 6072 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4434 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5611 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4438 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5375 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4439 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5769 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4440 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5216 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4441 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 4841 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4550 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 6633 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4551 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5788 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4552 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5477 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4553 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5480 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4628 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5304 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4595 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5729 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4596 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 6069 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4630 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 7471 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4632 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 6465 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
I4626 Hunter-Gatherer Latvia 5838 BCE Zvejnieki, Latvia View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I4626) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Western Steppe Pastoralists 71%
European Hunter-Gatherers 29%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (I4626) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 100%
Northwestern European 76%
Finnish 32.7%
Scandinavian 29.9%
English 9.8%
Northwestern European 3.7%
Eastern European 24%
Eastern European 24.0%
Africa 0%
West African 0%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample I4626 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

I4626,0.13097686,0.1084044,0.08589612,0.07498782,0.03555598,0.0301138,0.00996074,0.0166907,-0.00187508,-0.03114856,0.00030176,-0.0079181,0.01613284,0.01547604,-0.00449954,3.534E-05,-0.00025248,-0.00253086,0.00286678,-0.0004341,0.00172714,-0.00327276,-0.00307702,0.00524952,-0.00034687
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
The Neolithic Transition in the Baltic Was Not Driven by Admixture with Early European Farmers
Authors:
Jones ER, Zarina G, Moiseyev V
Abstract:

The Neolithic transition was a dynamic time in European prehistory of cultural, social, and technological change. Although this period has been well explored in central Europe using ancient nuclear DNA [1, 2], its genetic impact on northern and eastern parts of this continent has not been as extensively studied. To broaden our understanding of the Neolithic transition across Europe, we analyzed eight ancient genomes: six samples (four to ∼1- to 4-fold coverage) from a 3,500 year temporal transect (∼8,300-4,800 calibrated years before present) through the Baltic region dating from the Mesolithic to the Late Neolithic and two samples spanning the Mesolithic-Neolithic boundary from the Dnieper Rapids region of Ukraine. We find evidence that some hunter-gatherer ancestry persisted across the Neolithic transition in both regions. However, we also find signals consistent with influxes of non-local people, most likely from northern Eurasia and the Pontic Steppe. During the Late Neolithic, this Steppe-related impact coincides with the proposed emergence of Indo-European languages in the Baltic region [3, 4]. These influences are distinct from the early farmer admixture that transformed the genetic landscape of central Europe, suggesting that changes associated with the Neolithic package in the Baltic were not driven by the same Anatolian-sourced genetic exchange.

Save 85% coupon: DNADAY85

Valid until April 25 2025