N22 - A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era

A woman buried in Poland during the Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

N22
4442 BCE - 4243 BCE
Female
Poland
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

N22

Date Range

4442 BCE - 4243 BCE

Cultural Period

Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

U5a1c

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N/A (Female)

Social Role

Farmer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Poland
Locality Brzesc Kujawski
Coordinates 52.6100, 18.9000
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

N22 4442 BCE - 4243 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Overview

The Brześć Kujawski Group represents a Neolithic cultural grouping in Poland dated to about 4500–4000 BCE. It is typically discussed alongside wider Lengyel-related patterns in ceramic style and community organization.

Region & Environment

Neolithic Poland features fertile river valleys and plains that supported farming and pasture. Communities would have depended on productive soils, local water access, and the seasonality of agriculture.

Historical Context

Within European Neolithic sequences, the Brześć Kujawski horizon belongs to a phase of established farming and regional cultural interaction. Long-distance links are often inferred through similarities in artifact styles, especially ceramics.

Populations & Lifeways

Populations were primarily agricultural, with herding likely playing a significant role. Lifeways involved building and maintaining settlements, preparing foods, and producing everyday goods within household and community routines.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Material culture is dominated by pottery styles, including forms and decorative conventions used for daily tasks and storage. Stone tools, groundstone items, and organic material (where preserved) help reconstruct craft and subsistence activities.

Culture & Society

Ceramic style consistency suggests shared traditions and communication between communities. Settlement organization and the distribution of artifacts can indicate differences between households or activity areas, but broad political structure is not directly recoverable from the archaeological record alone.

Legacy & Transition

Later Neolithic and early Bronze Age phases build on the agricultural base and regional networks established during this time. Shifting pottery traditions and settlement patterns trace a gradual transition toward new cultural identities.

Chapter V

Genetics

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Europe 99.8%
Northwestern European 85.8%
Finnish 46.9%
Scandinavian 33.8%
Northwestern European 5.1%
Eastern European 14.1%
Eastern European 14.1%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Poland in the Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Polish Kashubian
2.7265
2
Estonian
3.0651
3
Polish
3.3331
4
Swedish
3.5273
5
Russian Kaluga
3.5348
6
Russian Kursk
3.5583
7
Russian Pskov
3.5722
8
Ukrainian Dnipro
3.6311
9
Russian Voronez
3.6399
10
Ukrainian Rivne
3.6439
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
N25 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4600 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N17 Early Bronze Age Poland 2020 BCE Gustorzyn, Poland View
N47 Corded Ware Culture, Poland 2600 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N45 Corded Ware Culture, Poland 2600 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N26 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4335 BCE Konary, Poland View
N49 Corded Ware Culture, Poland 2600 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N38 Globular Amphora Culture, Poland 3307 BCE Brzesc Kujawski, Poland View
N44 Corded Ware Culture, Poland 2571 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N19 Funnel Beaker Culture, Poland 3636 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N27 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4600 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N36 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4600 BCE Konary, Poland View
N18 Funnel Beaker Culture, Poland 3632 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N22 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4442 BCE Brzesc Kujawski, Poland View
N31 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4327 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N28 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4251 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N20 Funnel Beaker Culture, Poland 3633 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N42 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4233 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N17 2020 BCE Gustorzyn, Poland View
N18 3632 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N19 3636 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N20 3633 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N22 4442 BCE Brzesc Kujawski, Poland View
N25 4600 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N26 4335 BCE Konary, Poland View
N27 4600 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N28 4251 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N31 4327 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N36 4600 BCE Konary, Poland View
N38 3307 BCE Brzesc Kujawski, Poland View
N42 4233 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N44 2571 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N45 2600 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N47 2600 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
N49 2600 BCE Pikutkowo, Poland View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
N25 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4600 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N26 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4335 BCE Konary, Poland View
N27 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4600 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N36 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4600 BCE Konary, Poland View
N22 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4442 BCE Brzesc Kujawski, Poland View
N31 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4327 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N28 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4251 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
N42 Brześć Kujawski Group, Poland 4233 BCE Oslonki, Poland View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

A genomic Neolithic time transect of hunter-farmer admixture in central Poland

Authors Fernandes DM, Strapagiel D, Borówka P, Marciniak B, Żądzińska E et al.
Abstract

Ancient DNA genome-wide analyses of Neolithic individuals from central and southern Europe indicate an overall population turnover pattern in which migrating farmers from Anatolia and the Near East largely replaced autochthonous Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. However, the genetic history of the Neolithic transition in areas lying north of the European Neolithic core region involved different levels of admixture with hunter-gatherers. Here we analyse genome-wide data of 17 individuals spanning from the Middle Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (4300-1900 BCE) in order to assess the Neolithic transition in north-central Poland, and the local impacts of hunter-farmer contacts and Late Neolithic steppe migrations. We evaluate the influence of these on local populations and assess if and how they change through time, reporting evidence of recurrent hunter-farmer admixture over three millennia, and the co-existence of unadmixed hunter-gatherers as late as 4300 BCE. During the Late Neolithic we report the appearance of steppe ancestry, but on a lesser scale than previously described for other central European regions, with evidence of stronger affinities to hunter-gatherers than to steppe pastoralists. These results help understand the Neolithic palaeogenomics of another central European area, Kuyavia, and highlight the complexity of population interactions during those times.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

N22,0.133056,0.1217123,0.0812558,0.0710218,0.04093246,0.03145674,0.0069828,0.01426232,0.00044186,-0.02480924,-0.00140806,-0.00308896,0.0096954,0.00779868,0.004837,0.00086228,-0.00166094,-0.00175158,0.00320364,0.00089456,0.00415694,-0.00248574,-0.00334764,0.0091601,0.00101849
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 30% off Expires Aug 04